My Photo


David Thompson

FIRE

  • FIRE

StatCounter


Blog powered by Typepad

« Innards | Main | Vending Rage »

June 10, 2008

Comments

JuliaM

"They said that the delegation would also tell the EU that if such acts against Islam are not controlled, more attacks on the EU diplomatic missions abroad could not be ruled out."

Sounds like a threat to me. About time we dealt with it the way we deal with all threats...

David

Julia,

Well, I suppose it’s either a barely-veiled threat or an admission of widespread lawlessness and moral incontinence, possibly both. And the passive-aggressive tenor is hard to miss. What’s interesting is that almost every Islamic institution of any real size and influence makes much the same kind of noises. Their various demands and calls for “dialogue” and “respect” are premised on non-reciprocal assumptions of supremacy and submission, i.e. that it is somehow wrong for infidels to “offend” Islam, even by stating facts, and irrespective of what is done by Muslims in Islam’s name. This supremacist imperative may be couched in fluffy terms – of hurt feelings or whatever – but the underlying assumptions and subsequent demands are generally very similar. Crudely summarised: “Do as we say and flatter our voodoo, or people will get hurt and it’ll be all your fault.”

clazy

Moral incontinence: very nice. These guys pi$$ on anybody who disagrees with them and treat it like a favor.

rabbit

Q: Why are there so many shelters for battered women?

A: Because they just - don't - listen.

An obnoxious joke for sure, but Abbas would have it that the Dane's are responsible for the violence that Islamic terrorists have brought upon them. It's all the victim's fault.

A_Nonny_Mouse

The real question is:

How do we get our representatives here in our Western countries to see what's going on and stand up for US, the citizens who elected them? We pay their salaries, we've given them the power to act on our behalf. When will they put OUR welfare before the alleged "religious sensitivities" of a group that intends to dominate the world (using whatever tactics are necessary)?

We-the-people can see we're being railroaded into submitting to the Islamic mindset. We know it's time to push back; to tell these panderers of Islamo-supremism not just "No", but "HELL, NO!" when they make their quiet threats suggesting that --if we just stay silent, if we just pretend "respect", if we just give up our freedom to think and to choose-- the Islamic fifth column which is already at work in our homelands will leave us our heads (for now).

It's past time for our governments to take a stand to defend us.

irwin daisy

Britain receives further instructions from the Supreme beings:

"Malaysian president Abdullah Badawi calls for British Muslims to live under sharia law"

(telegraph.co.uk)

Muslim extremism in Britain will grow unless the Government and society learn to understand Islam, Malaysia's prime minister has warned.

Abdullah Badawi claimed that the legacy of Britain's imperial past has hampered its ability to appreciate its Islamic population.

In an interview with the Daily Telegraph, the prime minister urged Gordon Brown to allow the country's Muslims to live under sharia law, but also said that they must prove their worth to society.

His comments are set to fuel the debate over the role of Islam in Britain following the Church of England's attack on the Government for already giving more attention to Muslims than Christians.

The comments to this entry are closed.



Your filthy consumerism supports this blog.

Blogroll