Via Zombie comes news of a tremendous intellectual breakthrough at U.C. Berkeley. At midday on Friday, students will be graced by visiting lecturer Maximilian Mayer, a Research Fellow at Bonn University’s Centre for Global Studies. The lecture in question, Mitigating Global Warming Through Art - Exploring the Importance of Music for the Change of Lifestyles, offers no less than a blueprint for saving the world. The university’s events calendar provides a glimpse of things to come:
Whatever the new law carbon life may look like, simplification is a central issue. From the vantage point of the actor-network theory, simplification means to reduce the complexity of collectives. In order to simplify our life has to decrease the number of “things” one is entangled with in his/her daily life.
The language, she is beautiful.
Yet, one cannot substitute something with nothing.
This must be where the global salvation comes in.
What is the relevance of music for revolutions and societal cohesion? On a personal level, we are looking for an utterly new way of happiness and a quotidian practice that provides postmodern urban dwellers with sense and orientation.
An utterly new way of happiness. I told you it was big.
Music in general and art in particular seems to be a promising Archimedean point for multiple new life styles. Performing music and dancing... may be powerful enough to substitute the culture of consumerism since they enable a creativity-based self-autonomy as well as cultural self-sufficiency. “Back to art” could even open up the path to self-induced simplification in order to overcome the hegemonic consumerist environment... Humanity should not be primarily treated according to the logic of homo economicus. Rather it might be best envisioned as communities of artists.
It’s a revolution, people. Humanity will be reconceived as one big drum circle and the hegemon will be crushed beneath our happy, happy feet. Readers are welcome to speculate as to what form this momentous dancing endeavour might take. Doubtless it will be both elegant and awe-inspiring, perhaps a little like this.
The Revolution has been automated.
http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2010-02/wiimote-controlled-robot-drum-circle-makes-human-hippies-obsolete
I wonder if it can be programmed to play with Dance Dance Revolution...
Posted by: Jason Bontrager | February 23, 2010 at 17:44
"Performing music and dancing... may be powerful enough to substitute the culture of consumerism"
Because clubs and pop festivals really shook up that hegemonic consumerist environment...
Posted by: Anna | February 23, 2010 at 17:45
Maybe they should look at governments that encourage unsustainable growth of debt to create (and thus tax consumption) if they want to really do anything about over-consumption...
But that might require a bit less bong-time.
Posted by: AC1 | February 23, 2010 at 17:50
"we are looking for an utterly new way of happiness and a quotidian practice that provides postmodern urban dwellers with sense and orientation."
Academic modesty.
Posted by: carbon based lifeform | February 23, 2010 at 19:17
"Self-induced simplification"? Is that like putting a shotgun in your mouth? Because it certainly simplifies things. Keep your hands off my quotidian practice!
Posted by: clazy | February 23, 2010 at 19:28
"an utterly new way of happiness"
I think that's another typo. It should say hippiness.
Posted by: sk60 | February 23, 2010 at 20:33
As an art teacher I hear a lot of these ideas against consumerism from my students who see no problem in spending large sums of money on art supplies that are frankly, expensive, hard to produce, rare, and often highly toxic and not-at-all gaia-friendly. When I point this out, they nearly always make exceptions for their own consumption, because it's GOOD consumption and somehow doesn't count. Purchasing an energy efficient flatscreen is consumerism. Creating a work of art from several hundred dollars worth of manufactured goods is not. Even when I get through to some of them, their solutions are less than inspiring. Usually something about using "found," recycled or traditional materials.
Even if you're welding junk parts, you still need to buy the welder. Even if we go back to egg tempera we still have to buy the eggs.
They never realize just how much their own lifestyle depends on the so-called excesses of consumerism. An art store is as much a product of our consumerism as an electronics store, and that's before we get to the thorny subject of selling their art. If the tools to make their works causes consumerism, isn't the buyer on the other end "consuming" when they purchase their works made from manufactured paints and pre-gessoed canvases? Why isn't that consumerism?
That usually ends with the adamant riposte that it can't be consumerism because it's "art" at which point I tell them I'm going to sign my plasma screen and engage in several hours of "performance" everyday.
Posted by: Travis | February 23, 2010 at 20:57
"Performing music and dancing... may be powerful enough to substitute the culture of consumerism"
We should hook this guy up with the idiots at the NEF.
Posted by: Sam | February 23, 2010 at 21:15
Darn. I was hoping it came with scantily clad women and a pole. Now that's dancing!!!
Posted by: Maddog | February 23, 2010 at 21:23
Maddog,
That doesn't need extorted taxpayers money to survive... Therefore it's bad.
Socialism is an inverted morality based on narcissism therefore extorting money from taxpayers for your stuff = good. mutual reciprocation = bad.
Posted by: AC1 | February 23, 2010 at 22:58
Not to NOT make fun of hippies. They do kinda have a point. If you're too busy at the drum circle dancing, you're not shopping (or possibly using your consumerist goods, or opressing minorities).
Remember dance and music are to be free, no dance gulags (clubs) or selling out at music fesitvals. But feel free to buy my CD.
Posted by: Chris S | February 24, 2010 at 00:27
"you're not shopping (or possibly using your consumerist goods, or oppressing minorities)"
or mending the widow's leaky roof or studying brain surgery or building bridges or discovering cold fusion in your garage.
"we are looking for an utterly new way of happiness and a quotidian practice that provides postmodern urban dwellers with sense and orientation"
Read: We're miserable, unhappy bastards who have transcended the need for transcending the need for transcending transcendence for the 457th iteration and by Gaia we'll find a permanent state of ecstasy THIS time.
Posted by: dicentra | February 24, 2010 at 03:33
"They never realize just how much their own lifestyle depends on the so-called excesses of consumerism."
Nor how those who live at subsistence levels just don't have the time to engage in Art for the sake of Art. Any decoration the extremely poor do is on their utilitarian items: clothing, bowls, shaman's costumes. And it all looks the same: each tribe has its own style, and everyone follows it. No individualism is indulged.
The Anasazi never constructed art museums. The Masai don't erect statuary that challenges traditional notions of beauty. The Nepalese don't smear yak dung on their deities to protest Teh Patriarchy.
Only a very wealthy society with plenty of leisure can indulge Artists as such. And a very spoiled one.
Posted by: dicentra | February 24, 2010 at 03:44
So does this mean the grasshopper was right?
Posted by: B Moe | February 24, 2010 at 04:13
Dicentra,
“...by Gaia we’ll find a permanent state of ecstasy THIS time.”
The Zombie article links to a remarkable number of dancing-for-Gaia events, with organisers making much the same bewildering pronouncements: “It’s important our message is carried from head to toe, in dance, in music and ultimately in policy and action.” It all seems rather fatuous and self-congratulatory, as such things generally do. (For some reason I’m reminded of “masturbate for peace.”*) Perhaps these dance events are imagined to work as propaganda or “consciousness raising” or something. Either way, they seem to underline a kind of quasi-religious sentiment. I suspect that for some it’s a form of worship. And the fact that Mayer’s flimflam is taken so seriously – or seriously at all - probably tells us something about Berkeley’s academic standards.
* http://www.masturbateforpeace.com/
Posted by: David | February 24, 2010 at 07:41
David,
When ARE you going to get Ark-B ready? I'm getting impatient.
Posted by: AC1 | February 24, 2010 at 15:30
In the extension of self-reflexivity by percussion participants, any cultural references are veritably steamrolled by the facilitation of exhibition-attention/psychosocial projections.
Drum Circles = Choking the Proverbial Chicken
Posted by: www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawmnpFmHbbBGG7jqAaJdHSn1Lz4CxvNScto | February 24, 2010 at 19:22
“...we are looking for an utterly new way of happiness and a quotidian practice that provides postmodern urban dwellers with sense and orientation.”
I’m intrigued by the use of the word “quotidian” here. It goes clunk in the middle of the sentence. It is unidiomatic. I’m getting on in years and I have never once heard anyone use that word in everyday (forgive me) speech. I’m not all that well-read but I only recall encountering the word “quotidian” spoken by medical types in Victorian novels. When I saw that sentence I couldn’t help feeling that its author was someone who had recently encountered the word “quotidian” and was keen to use it to show off his or her learning. It seems to me to be an example of someone using a posh or clever word where a simpler word would do as well. It’s pure speculation, of course, but in the absence of evidence to the contrary, I can’t help thinking that the author of that sentence is a bit of a twerp.
Posted by: Horace Dunn | February 25, 2010 at 00:25
"we are looking for ... a quotidian practice that provides postmodern urban dwellers with sense and orientation."
Most of us 'modern' urban dwellers refer to that as a
"job", Professor Meyer. And, really sir, you aren't breaking any new ground -Todd Rundgren beat you to the idea... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VgAU4vPco9M&feature=related
Posted by: Terry_Jim | February 25, 2010 at 05:11
Horace,
“I’m intrigued by the use of the word ‘quotidian’ here. It goes clunk in the middle of the sentence.”
It’s to signal the author’s cleverness in relation to his students. Academics who work in disreputable or imaginary subjects often feel a need to do that. As I’ve said before, it helps if you imagine a tiny creature inflating its gas bladder to intimidate passers-by.
Posted by: David | February 25, 2010 at 06:49
Truth, fact, and reality carry little weight for the far left. Everything is politics and perception. Thus, when it comes to saving ourselves from ourselves, dancing makes as much as sense as anything.
Posted by: Rabbit | February 25, 2010 at 15:15
Um, sounds pretty much like the weekly jazzercize class to me. Since it's Berkeley, of course, minus the overweight matrons in shiny spandex (no synthetics for THESE guys) -- but knock out the chirpy 20-something hard-body gym rat and sub in the moody dreadlocked enlightened Dance Leader, and you've got yourself a quotidian world-saving activity.
Posted by: Megaera | March 02, 2010 at 03:59
David Thompson wrote, "The language, she is beautiful."
ROFLMAO!
Posted by: Jeff | March 02, 2010 at 21:33