When a famous tantric guru boasted on television that he could kill another man using only his mystical powers, most viewers either gasped in awe or merely nodded unquestioningly. Sanal Edamaruku’s response was different. “Go on then - kill me,” he said.
Mr Edamaruku had been invited to the same talk show as head of the Indian Rationalists’ Association - the country’s self-appointed sceptic-in-chief. At first the holy man, Pandit Surender Sharma, was reluctant, but eventually he agreed to perform a series of rituals designed to kill Mr Edamaruku live on television. Millions tuned in as the channel cancelled scheduled programming to continue broadcasting the showdown.
Thankfully, there’s a clip of the most tense moment of this paranormal confrontation, complete with chilling music.
First, the master chanted mantras, then he sprinkled water on his intended victim. He brandished a knife, ruffled the sceptic’s hair and pressed his temples. But after several hours of similar antics, Mr Edamaruku was still very much alive.
All of which is flimsy excuse to post a link to this.
Via Peter Risdon.
They were obviously quite evenly matched.
Posted by: Anna | March 23, 2010 at 11:19
Didn't anyone think it was a bit strange that a holy man was willing to kill someone on TV?
Posted by: John D | March 23, 2010 at 11:50
I'm reminded of Uri Geller's appearance on "The Tonight Show"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TNKmhv9uoiQ
Johnny Carson had done some work as a magician in his younger days, and so knew all the tricks charlatans like Geller might use -- and wouldn't let Geller use them on his stage.
Posted by: Ted S., Catskills, NY | March 23, 2010 at 12:49
'Didn't anyone think it was a bit strange that a holy man was willing to kill someone on TV?'
These days? Sadly, no...
Posted by: JuliaM | March 23, 2010 at 14:00
Pah, I can kill a man with my mystical powers too. Well it's not so much that I *kill* them with the powers, I just bludgeon them with a stick, it's rather that I destroy their soul afterwards as it escapes. You just can't really see that part on TV, so you'll just have to take my word for it.
Posted by: Chris S | March 23, 2010 at 19:14
You cynics!
The spell doesn't work instantly. He'll be dead before 50 years have gone by.
Posted by: TDK | March 24, 2010 at 23:03
I have super intellectual powers too. I can imagine New Labour under Brown proving to be the best thing that ever happened to us.
Um... on second thoughts...
Posted by: Steve | March 25, 2010 at 11:18
Steve's picking up signals from a parallel universe.
Posted by: Anna | March 25, 2010 at 11:27
Speaking of y'alls upcoming election, if any of you aren't planning to vote, can you give your vote to me? i.e: http://blog.talkingphilosophy.com/?p=1689
Posted by: KRW/WTP | March 25, 2010 at 12:56
KRW,
Heh. As someone points out in the TP comments, “people who don’t vote are even less likely to vote on behalf of someone else.” (And I suspect a significant part of the electorate is more motivated to vote a party or leader out, rather than in, which may have some bearing on turnouts generally). Then there’s the likelihood of candidates overseas being more easily construed in cartoonish, perhaps misleading, ways (think Bush as depicted by the Guardian’s Steve Bell, or Chavez as imagined by the Islington left). Another commenter notes, “what guarantee do I have as an agnostic/atheist Afghani that you will cast my vote for the Tory of my choice?”
Which for some reason made me smile.
Posted by: David | March 25, 2010 at 14:01
David,
Yeah, that was me. I post from several different browsers on several different machines and I still had my old/new (KRW/WTP) handles on this one...Changed ID's when I started my Sherman's Cowlick blog.
Posted by: WTP | March 25, 2010 at 14:07