This chap, via Peter Risdon. I do hope someone’s told Caroline Lucas.
« Friday Ephemera | Main | Elsewhere (80) »
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
I prefer to think of it as undulating knowledge.
Posted by: John D | December 01, 2012 at 13:18
Is the science engorged, or merely tumescent?
Posted by: Spiny Norman | December 01, 2012 at 14:04
Turgid...science is definitely and most discernably turgid.
Posted by: WTP | December 01, 2012 at 15:15
Forget the homeopathy. I'm waiting for George's update on his homopathy.
Posted by: Van der Leun | December 01, 2012 at 16:56
The single best explanation of homeopathy.
Posted by: wayne fontes | December 01, 2012 at 17:34
I was sceptical about homeopathy but this pulsating business has really opened my eyes.
Posted by: sk60 | December 01, 2012 at 17:56
It's a load of shit, that's what it is.
Posted by: Rob | December 02, 2012 at 00:07
The logical end of homeopathy, of course, is that you can cure absolutely anything with absolutely nothing.
Posted by: mojo | December 02, 2012 at 06:37
At first I thought this was a spoof... and then I followed the links. Oh dear.
Posted by: Karen M | December 02, 2012 at 08:20
Karen,
At first I thought this was a spoof... and then I followed the links. Oh dear.
Oh, he’s quite real, if unrealistic, and rather sly. For instance, see how Mr Vithoulkas responds to a critical piece in the Economist. Our homeopathic guru complains of “several distorted points” in the article, none of which he specifies or addresses in any way. Instead he quotes one brief passage:
Mr Vithoulkas responds thus:
Which isn’t what the Economist article, or anyone, is ridiculing. What the passage doubts is the “imprint left on the water” business. Which of course Mr Vithoulkas doesn’t address. Instead, he pretends that the Economist is scorning the idea that eating vast amounts of salt will make you very ill.
See, the science is pulsating.
Posted by: David | December 02, 2012 at 08:54
Mr. Vithoulkas' mind is pulsating? A more accurate term is peristalsis.
Posted by: pst314 | December 02, 2012 at 20:10
His mind is a raging torrent, flooded with rivulets of thought cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives.
I need a cigarette. And I don't even smoke.
Posted by: rabbit | December 02, 2012 at 21:06
Come on over here, baby, I've got a living, pulsating knowledge to put in your mouth...er...I mean, mind.
Posted by: L | December 03, 2012 at 02:51
My favorite explanation of homeopathy
Posted by: Ted S., Catskill Mtns., NY, USA | December 03, 2012 at 12:20
"... a living pulsating knowledge within the mind..."
... and here I was, thinking it was a migraine.
Posted by: Matt | December 03, 2012 at 21:10
Time to trot out the old joke about the guy who forgot to take his homoeopathic medicine and died of an overdose.
Posted by: David Gillies | December 05, 2012 at 02:45
A homeopath I once (in 1985) argued that homeopathy could cure AIDS better than allopathic scientific medicine. I agreed 100% and said that without a doubt treating all AIDS patients with a bottle of distilled water and a few herbs would solve the AIDS crisis. I never heard about a homeopathic remedy for AIDS from that homeopath again. Even homeopaths know it's fake.
Posted by: ErisGuy | December 05, 2012 at 13:27
The Huffington Post is throbbing too.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/tomchiversscience/100193259/huffington-post-explains-how-homeopathic-medicines-work-without-bothering-to-mention-that-they-dont/
Posted by: mlrosty | December 08, 2012 at 20:07