David Thompson


Blog powered by Typepad

« Soft Student Brains | Main | Image Problem »

June 18, 2007



And more absurd religious sentiments offended in Pakistan:

[Pakistan's minister for parliamentary affairs, Sher Afgan Khan Niazi, who proposed the resolution condemning the honour, branded Rushdie a "blasphemer".

She told MPs: "The 'sir' title from Britain for blasphemer Salman Rushdie has hurt the sentiments of the Muslims across the world. Every religion should be respected. I demand the British government immediately withdraw the title as it is creating religious hatred."]




That of course in an article quoting the protesters as follows:

[MPs said the honour was an insult to the religious sentiments of Muslims. In the eastern city of Multan, hardline Muslim students burned effigies of the Queen and Rushdie, chanting "Kill him! Kill him!"]



Thanks. I saw much the same via the BBC. See update above.

Vegas Art Guy

...start sarcasam

And we're shocked why? This is the religion of peace after all. They would never actually call for the death of someone they disagree with...

...end sarcasam


Did you see this from the Pakistani religious affairs minister, Mohammend Ijaz ul-Haq:

"The West is accusing Muslims of extremism and terrorism. If someone exploded a bomb on his body, he would be right to do so unless the British government apologizes and withdraws the 'sir' title."

When the minister is next in the UK, perhaps for a nice 'inter-faith' conference, he should be asked if he stands by this threat - I think there could be a case for a citizen's' arrest under the anti-terror laws.

See my own thoughts on the 'Sir Salman' affair on my blog (Martin in the Margins)



Ul-Haq’s statement neatly conveys the moral inversion of Islamist belief. Oh, and thanks for the link (pasted below):


The letter by Lisa Appignanesi is interesting and explains the probable reasoning behind the knighthood. What’s more interesting, I think, is that so many of the comments below Gopal’s Guardian article are concerned with Rushdie’s literary merits (or lack thereof), as if that were the paramount concern. The fact that a British citizen has been threatened with murder, repeatedly, for writing a novel and subsequently criticising an oppressive and primitive ideology is, oddly, being avoided. I suppose that tells us something about the priorities of many Guardian readers.

Josh Scholar

I did not know that there such a subject as "postcolonial studies". Oh God!

Ric Locke

I did not know that there such a subject as "postcolonial studies". -- Josh Scholar

There isn't. There's a pretentious pseudoacademic scam by that name. Its practitioners studiosly ignore any and all instances of actually existing colonialism in favor of vociferously denouncing, e.g., the opening of a McDonald's as "Imperialist".

Glenn the Lawyer

"Hysterical vanities": Could there be a more perfect phrase for the normal behavioral reactions of the Neanderthal segment of the human race? You should trademark it, David.


I confess to being agnostic on the subject of Rushdie - whose book I found to be numbingly uninteresting when I tried to read it.

The Iranian Mullahs, on the other hand, can go straight to Iblis for all I care. Putting out contracts on writers and translators, and then getting offended when people call your barbaric act barbaric is about the stupidest thing I've ever heard of. Of course, I don't get around much in Islamic shitholes, so take that opinion for what it's worth.

Ophelia Benson

Man...Bari is a piece of work.

>>Muhammad Abdul Bari, secretary-general of the Muslim Council of Britain, said many Muslims would regard the knighthood as the final insult from Tony Blair before he leaves office next week. "Salman Rushdie earned notoriety amongst Muslims for the highly insulting and blasphemous manner in which he portrayed early Islamic figures," Dr Bari said. "The granting of a knighthood to him can only do harm to the image of our country in the eyes of hundreds of millions of Muslims across the world. Many will interpret the knighthood as a final contemptuous parting gift from Tony Blair to the Muslim world."

Note the failure to mention the slightly more serious matter of the fatwa, and of the murder of the Japanese translator - why doesn't he worry about that insult? Because he has a warped sense of priorities, that's why.



See today’s post for more on Bari’s priorities. Like his predecessor, he’s a dissembler and a moral cretin. And possibly something much worse.


The comments to this entry are closed.

Amazon Link