Depth Perception
October 20, 2009
Just 8 km in diameter, Saturn’s moon Daphnis casts its shadow. The tiny moon’s gravity creates waves in Saturn’s A ring that extend above the plane to a height of 1.5 km. Image taken by Cassini in visible light on June 26, at a distance of approximately 823,000 km from Daphnis.
More, with animations. Related: Planetary Bling.
Awesome. Long live Cassini.
Posted by: sk60 | October 20, 2009 at 15:10
I also like this shot of Prometheus disturbing Saturn’s F ring. It almost looks like soft caramel.
http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/10/saturn_at_equinox.html#photo4
And, hey, an animation…
http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/10/saturn_at_equinox.html#photo21
Posted by: David | October 20, 2009 at 15:34
Beautiful. All that, and lovely dresses as well:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oleg_Cassini
Posted by: Mr Eugenides | October 20, 2009 at 16:09
I see I’ll have to fix the lock on that liquor cabinet.
Posted by: David | October 20, 2009 at 16:12
Nonsense, it's just how Evil Inc stores sound files.
Posted by: AntiCitizenOne | October 20, 2009 at 18:01
Those pictures are amazing, and they make me long for the day when we can get out there and build WorldHouses around all those moons: http://www.orionsarm.com/eg-article/484746e824a3a
...someday.
Posted by: Jason Bontrager | October 20, 2009 at 18:32
The fact that Saturn is in equinox is why we're getting these amazing pictures: sunlight is edge-on to the rings. But when Cassini was launched no-one would have bet that its mission could have been extended until now. It's been an absolute treasure-trove, along with the Huygens probe into Titan's atmosphere. There are times when I look back at my childhood dream of working at Caltech or the JPL and really wish I'd given it a shot.
Posted by: David Gillies | October 21, 2009 at 04:47
Beautiful pictures, David.
I wonder if the Cassini-protesters still are miffed about the probe?
I think I remember my local newspapers resurrecting the issue when Cassine was performing it's slingshot maneuver and approached Earth again, a year or two after it's launch.
So - when will we see these things propelled by ion-engines powered from fusion-reactors?
-S
Posted by: Simen Thoresen | October 21, 2009 at 06:13
Simen, if Polywell ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polywell ) works out we could have fusion-powered space craft within 20 years. We should know in a year or two (much better than the standard "fusion is just 10/20/30 years away" that's been the rule for the past 50 years).
Posted by: Jason Bontrager | October 21, 2009 at 15:18
Or we could just harness the power of elephants. As a fuel source, I mean.
Posted by: David | October 21, 2009 at 15:26
No need for fusion. Ion engines can be powered by radioisotope generators or nuclear fission.
Solar would also work even for outer planets where the Sun is dim - the acceleration could be acomplished when the probe is closer to the Sun.
It's funny how snagging orbital momentum from planets to accelerate spacecraft had little mention in popular culture before it was actually done.
Planets actually lose momentum as the space probe gains momentum. I read that the figure was something like, the Earth fell closer to the Sun by the diamter of a proton during the Cassini fly-by.
Posted by: Wm T Sherman | October 22, 2009 at 03:37