Friday Ephemera
November 13, 2015
Don’t worry, he’s not naked. // You want one and you know it. // When your nearest neighbour is Area 51. // His swordsmanship is better than yours. // The Hindenburg’s interiors. // Cats unimpressed by feline-human hybrid. // A visual history of Macy’s Thanksgiving parades, 1929-1964. // The untidy moons of Pluto. // At last, clip-on man buns. // Man with broom, brooming. // A Mongolian record shop. // On a classic of Australian television drama. // Advent calendars filled with liquor. // Crooked timber. // Magnetism. // This rent map of London is not for the squeamish. // The Three Laws of Robotics do not work. Would an autonomous robot surgeon perform an abortion? // And finally, it turns out there are around 1.2 million people with my surname. What about yours?
Don’t worry, he’s not naked.
Bring back the exploding shrimp and dumplings.
Posted by: Hal | November 13, 2015 at 01:19
Re: Liquor Advent calendars. They started rolling out Advent Beer cases last year in BC, Canada.
http://preview.tinyurl.com/q2cnhav
Cheers!
Posted by: Russtovich | November 13, 2015 at 02:14
"BUCK NAKED," not "butt naked."
But I guess folk etymologies often win the day.
Posted by: dicentra | November 13, 2015 at 02:15
Only 300 people have my last name. I bet they're all related, too.
Posted by: Dom | November 13, 2015 at 03:13
Don’t worry, he’s not naked.
Hey, Honey! Let me show you what I learned from the internet!
Posted by: R. Sherman | November 13, 2015 at 03:17
There's apparently about 70,000 Pollards in the world, but we're pretty common in Australia with about 9% of all of us living in Australia.
Posted by: TimP | November 13, 2015 at 04:31
More on surnames:
There's a around 1200 Hitlers in the world; a fairly large chunk of them in Tanzania and India. (Interestingly enough a big chunk of Mengeles are also in Tanzania.)
Stalins are a bit more common at 8500, with fairly large chunks in Bangladesh and India.
Posted by: TimP | November 13, 2015 at 04:40
At last, clip-on man buns.
This must stop.
Posted by: Joan | November 13, 2015 at 07:50
On a classic of Australian television drama.
Vinegar tits! Brings back memories of being a student. *Checks Amazon for DVD*
Posted by: Joan | November 13, 2015 at 07:55
Vinegar tits!
During the early Nineties it was on at some ungodly hour, about 4am or something. I recall stumbling in from a club in a state of disarray and being captivated by it. 692 episodes of compelling tat.
Posted by: David | November 13, 2015 at 08:04
Brace yourself, Joan. Re-live the dream.
Posted by: David | November 13, 2015 at 09:23
Re-live the dream.
Thanks. :-)
Posted by: Joan | November 13, 2015 at 09:46
Cultural appropriation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fnb7EqfykF4
Posted by: Sam | November 13, 2015 at 14:02
Cultural appropriation.
Heh. There just isn’t enough mechanical organ in modern pop.
Posted by: David | November 13, 2015 at 14:14
hmmm... I remember posting about only 12,012 Clicks in the world
I guess "click" triggered the spam filter. ;-)
Posted by: Darleen | November 13, 2015 at 14:37
Jason Whitlock, a sports journalist and pundit writes about the current kerfuffle at Mizzou.
Posted by: R. Sherman | November 13, 2015 at 14:54
This week, I have mostly been playing The Room 2.
Posted by: David | November 13, 2015 at 15:37
Meanwhile on Twitter, Laurie is Fretting.
One.
Two.
Three.
Posted by: David | November 13, 2015 at 18:38
Only 11 people with my surname, nine of them here in the US. In addition to me, Dad, my brother, my now deceased mother, and my sister-in-law, I'm wondering who the other six are.
That doesn't include the original German form of the name, which had an umlaut, or other respellings once immigrants got to America, which would include a 1930s Hollywood director and a female singer from the past decade.
Posted by: Ted S., Catskill Mtns., NY, USA | November 13, 2015 at 20:34
From the Mongolian record shop link : "rare state-sponsored Mongolian rock bands."
Posted by: Col. Milquetoast | November 13, 2015 at 21:11
Only 11 people with my surname,
See, now I’m feeling positively common.
Posted by: David | November 13, 2015 at 21:13
Just when you thought American culture has hit rock bottom, we sink a little more.
http://everydayfeminism.com/2015/11/common-examples-cissexism/
Posted by: Dom | November 13, 2015 at 21:54
Just when you thought American culture has hit rock bottom, we sink a little more.
I wouldn’t describe this kind of pretentious and competitive neuroticism as “American culture.” It’s a dysfunctional subset of leftist culture, itself a dysfunctional subset. And one that almost every American I’ve known would regard as ludicrous and alien.
Posted by: David | November 13, 2015 at 22:18
My surname is (as we understood) an Alsatian variant of a German spelling; it is most common, as we knew, in Louisiana. Well, there, and it seems that there are also some 61000 of us in Bangladesh. Not in India, mind -- only one there. Perhaps he reaches out occasionally to some of the Bangladeshis... that would ease my mind, I think.
Posted by: Megaera | November 14, 2015 at 05:46
But I don't want a wet raccoon and I know it.
Posted by: Rich Rostrom | November 14, 2015 at 09:12
Meanwhile on Twitter, Laurie is Fretting.
"Is there a word to describe 'someone whose thinking is sloppier than it could be' that isn't ableist?"
Er, how about 'Laurie Penny'?
Posted by: Joan | November 14, 2015 at 09:55
Er, how about ‘Laurie Penny’?
It’s all a bit, “Look at how clever I am in fretting about how my drawing attention to other people’s stupidity, and therefore my own cleverness, might theoretically upset people much less clever than me. Not that I like drawing attention to my own cleverness, of course, being as I am so terribly righteous and egalitarian.”
This, from the woman whose prose is defined by hyperbole, question-begging and a disregard for facts. The woman for whom logic is just a synonym for “pile of unsupported and contradictory assertions.” The woman who thinks that businesses should pay low-skilled staff much higher wages because businesses don’t need to be competitive.
And note the implication that only bigoted, sexist people could possibly think her stupid. Or more accurately, foolish.
Posted by: David | November 14, 2015 at 10:20
Crymobs, crybullying, and the left's whiny war on free speech
Posted by: CB | November 14, 2015 at 11:30
I finally got the Forebears link to work. Despite what I thought was a fairly common name, only about 224,000 have it. The shortened version of it is claimed by nearly 3 million, though.
Posted by: Spiny Norman | November 14, 2015 at 15:31
Corbyn really is as dumb as a box of rocks, as I believe they say in Montana.
"It appears Mohammed Emwazi has been held to account for his callous and brutal crimes. However, it would have been far better for us all if he had been held to account in a court of law....These events only underline the necessity of accelerating international efforts, under the auspices of the UN, to bring an end to the Syrian conflict as part of a comprehensive regional settlement."
It seems to me that he thinks the UN is a bit like International Rescue (of "Thunderbirds" fame*) instead of a corrupt, bloated and monumentally useless bureaucracy.
*For the benefit of those who may be baffled by this reference
Posted by: Lancastrian Oik | November 14, 2015 at 15:35
I think intellectual (?) ableism is something I don't instantly grasp because 'being clever' was so much my core identity growing up.
I wouldn't have thought it possible for someone that small to be possessed of that amount of smugness.
Meantime, in the wake of the Paris atrocities; I don't know what it's like for others here, but on my preferred social media feed, the tu quoque/whataboutery levels are rising fast thanks to the Lefties desperately trying (and failing) to appear concerned whilst maintaining their usual stance that it is, naturally, all the fault of the West/because Palestine/Iraq/Afghanistan/whatever despite the explicit message regarding the reasoning (I use that term very loosely) behind the Bataclan massacre.
Posted by: Lancastrian Oik | November 14, 2015 at 15:49
to bring an end to the Syrian conflict as part of a comprehensive regional settlement."
Now there's the nut of it, inninit? In all my study of current events over the past too many decades, in conflict after conflict, dispute after dispute, nothing is ever comprehensive enough. What the world needs more than anything is a comprehensive solution, dammit. And we want it NOW.
Posted by: WTP | November 14, 2015 at 16:26
I wouldn’t have thought it possible for someone that small to be possessed of that amount of smugness.
Self-flattery is the fuel of modern leftism.
Posted by: David | November 14, 2015 at 18:24
Just discovered the "pre-Anglicized" version of my surname is possessed by 461 people, scattered throughout Alsace and Lorraine. Very cool.
Posted by: R. Sherman | November 14, 2015 at 18:29
Mr Oik, I think it would have been better to reference Thunderbirds with this clip. ;-)
Posted by: Ted S., Catskill Mtns., NY, USA | November 14, 2015 at 20:22
J-pop vs. 70's Rock: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ivJZljEostE
Posted by: jabrwok | November 14, 2015 at 22:05
Tonikaku - a more complete version - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5CXtWLk_PAA
Don't worry, he is also wearing in that one, but more 'hey's are provided.
Posted by: dan | November 15, 2015 at 10:53
OT
This here has to be the most egregious abuse of the collective ‘we’ and ‘our’ I have seen in a long time.
Pour example
As Europeans we have always viewed ourselves as fully human, but seen those in the Middle East and much of the rest of the world as slightly less than human, and not quite as deserving of our sympathy. It is such feelings that allowed Europe to colonise, abuse and exploit brown people.
In short, anyone who expresses dismay and even grief at what happened in Paris is not only doing it wrong but part of the problem. I cannot find words for the utter contempt I have for this buffoon’s posturing.
Posted by: Nikw211 | November 15, 2015 at 14:33
the most egregious abuse of the collective ‘we’ and ‘our’ I have seen in a long time.
But his pieties, see how they catch the light!
Posted by: David | November 15, 2015 at 15:45
In other news… this.
Posted by: David | November 15, 2015 at 20:36
But his pieties, see how they catch the light!
They are - almost - nonpareil.
I don’t know if you clicked through, but if you go to the About page, you discover that not only has Cook been "based in Nazareth, Israel, since 2001” but during that time he has published books entitled Blood and Religion: The Unmasking of the Jewish State (2006), Israel and the Clash of Civilisations: Iraq, Iran and the Plan to Remake the Middle East (2008), and Disappearing Palestine: Israel’s Experiments in Human Despair (2008).
I know it’s a common paradox, but I am fascinated with the conundrum that had he been living in, say, Saudi since 2001, the idea that he would be able to not only remain and also publish works critical of that country's regime is completely laughable.
This is not to say that the Israeli government should be beyond criticism, but that surely there is an irony in Cook’s declaration that “We”, not sure who he has in mind by that, but never mind, “We are still trying to civilise brown people. We still think we have the right to change them, bend them to our will, improve them by force. We still want to lecture them, condemn them, threaten them, overturn their elections, arm their oppressive leaders, plunder their resources.”
Hmm. I can’t help but feel that he is telling his readers more about himself than he realises given the country he has made home for the last 14 years and the kind of things he says about it, judging by the titles of his books.
Posted by: Nikw211 | November 15, 2015 at 21:39
In other news… this.
*Insert 48pt exclamation mark here*
Posted by: Nikw211 | November 15, 2015 at 21:51
*Insert 48pt exclamation mark here*
I’m struggling to imagine the obliviousness required.
Posted by: David | November 15, 2015 at 21:53
As Europeans we have always viewed ourselves as fully human, but seen those in the Middle East and much of the rest of the world as slightly less than human, and not quite as deserving of our sympathy. It is such feelings that allowed Europe to colonise, abuse and exploit brown people.
Note also the meta-context that when there's Islamic terrorism against the west, of course we're supposed to look at the root causes behind it and make other equivocations. But if you were to make suggestions regarding the Anders Breiviks of the world, the allegedly tolerant class of people in media/academia/Brussels would have a screaming fit.
Posted by: Ted S., Catskill Mtns., NY, USA | November 16, 2015 at 00:08
In other news… this.
That can't be real. Parody, surely?
Posted by: 01 | November 16, 2015 at 17:13
That can’t be real. Parody, surely?
Oh, it’s quite real.
Posted by: David | November 16, 2015 at 17:25
Artistic commentary . . . .

Posted by: Hal | November 17, 2015 at 20:29
More commentary 'cause just too perfect . . .
Posted by: Hal | November 18, 2015 at 17:13