Following his appearance at a “white privilege” conference, a white male sociologist corrects a small factual error - and is promptly denounced.
You see, politely correcting a factual error - and thereby revealing an insinuation of “white supremacy” as absurd - is somehow proof of “defensiveness,” “white fragility,” and, by implication, latent white evil.
Via Damian, who adds, “It doesn’t matter how actually correct you are; you will never appease the politically correct.” Quite. Because the drama, indignation and passive-aggressive spite must go on indefinitely. How else will people know their place in the egalitarian pecking order, and to whom they should defer, always and forever?