For those who missed the update, the third part of Everyday Feminism’s “Healing from Toxic Whiteness” online seminar, relayed by the intrepid SJW Nonsense, is now available. This is the one in which Everyday Feminism founder Sandra Kim insists that “people of colour” can feel the emotions of their ancestors via “inter-generational trauma,” which is, we’re told, passed on “genetically” and “lives inside of your body.”
Lamarck smiles.
Posted by: jabrwok | January 30, 2017 at 14:08
These people are messed up.
Posted by: V | January 30, 2017 at 14:17
These people are messed up.
The participants do seem to be hopelessly credulous. Though I still can’t decide if Ms Kim is an incompetent hustler or genuinely unhinged. It’s such pernicious and stupefying claptrap – the point of which seems to be to displace responsibility among those deemed sufficiently brown, while inculcating pretentious guilt among pale-skinned saps.
I was faintly entertained by how Ms Kim says “right?” at the end of each bizarre and rambling pseudo-scientific assertion, as if to head off objection, or to excuse the number of sentences that meander and then crumble without getting anywhere. Just as she repeatedly says “And so,” as if it were an incantation – as if just saying those two words somehow made laughable and unrelated things add up to something persuasive.
Posted by: David | January 30, 2017 at 14:24
... “inter-generational trauma,” which is, we’re told, passed on “genetically” and “lives inside of your body.”
An interesting variant of Lamarckism there...
And the effect is so strong that that it was not felt at all by that chap a while back who discovered that he had no slave blood at all, all his ancestors haviing immigrated to the USA in the 20th century.
Posted by: abacab | January 30, 2017 at 14:40
Actually there may be some effect, the size and duration of which is currently unknown. I present this without comment.
A person's experience as a child or teenager can have a profound impact on their future children's lives, new work is showing. Rachel Yehuda, a researcher in the growing field of epigenetics and the intergenerational effects of trauma, and her colleagues have long studied mass trauma survivors and their offspring. Their latest results reveal that descendants of people who survived the Holocaust have different stress hormone profiles than their peers, perhaps predisposing them to anxiety disorders.
Posted by: Jonathan | January 30, 2017 at 14:50
I present this without comment.
See around 3:50 onwards in the third video, which highlights larger and more recent studies that find either a slightly diminished incidence of anxiety disorders or no correlation at all.
Posted by: David | January 30, 2017 at 15:08
Is this PeakStupid?
https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2017/jan/30/tie-length-a-worrying-guide-to-trumps-state-of-mind?CMP=twt_gu
Posted by: ac1 | January 30, 2017 at 15:13
... larger and more recent studies that find either a slightly diminished incidence of anxiety disorders or no correlation at all.
Rats! As quite a few of my ancestors were slaughtered by Muslims in the Middle-East, I was hoping for some sweet, sweet victimhood points.
Posted by: Jonathan | January 30, 2017 at 15:16
As quite a few of my ancestors were slaughtered by Muslims in the Middle-East, I was hoping for some sweet, sweet victimhood points.
And as noted in the video, the number of people who could, in theory, invoke some supposed effect (across several generations, even centuries, based on bugger all) is enormous, since any number of people could, in theory, appeal either to distant history or some more immediate relative’s horrific experience as a basis for special favours, in perpetuity. Though, obviously, if those doing the claiming happen to have pale skin, I doubt the ladies at Everyday Feminism would be terribly accommodating.
Posted by: David | January 30, 2017 at 15:27
It’s perhaps worth noting that the people whose claims might seem among the strongest, assuming an effect exists – say, immediate descendants of Holocaust survivors – are not generally the ones demanding special accommodation for some ghostly but disabling “intergenerational trauma.” Such that their grades, behaviour and emotional incontinence should be excused and viewed deferentially, for as long as they find convenient. Instead, we hear from middle-class women with time and money to waste on Women’s Studies courses and fatuous New Age seminars on “toxic whiteness.”
Posted by: David | January 30, 2017 at 15:44
Also via SJW Nonsense, this.
Posted by: David | January 30, 2017 at 16:26
Kinda obvious question but has yet to be asked...Is it just emotions that can be passed on genetically or can things such as work ethic, propensity to violence, intelligence, etc. also be inherited? Asking for a friend. He seems terribly concerned by this. I told him to get his dumb ass back to work or I'd bop him one, so no rush on the answer...
Posted by: WTP | January 30, 2017 at 17:29
Related. https://twitter.com/CounterMoonbat/status/826120316627931137
Posted by: Rafi | January 30, 2017 at 18:55
Is it just emotions that can be passed on genetically or can things such as work ethic, propensity to violence, intelligence, etc. also be inherited? Asking for a friend.
Tell your friend not to worry: evolution doesn't operate above the neck.
Posted by: Jonathan | January 30, 2017 at 19:01
Related.
And another vacuous bigot emerges from her egg. I keep having to check that these people are real.
Posted by: David | January 30, 2017 at 19:02
Insofar as we are directly descended from 2,044 different people in a mere ten generations—if my quick addition is correct—that's quite a bit of intergenerational trauma for all of us to shoulder. How do we manage?
But soldier on we must.
Posted by: Burnsie | January 30, 2017 at 19:13
Intergenerational Trauma
I grew up in a neighborhood where most of the father's had spent time in various locales in Europe and the Pacific during the '40s. Off the top of my head, I recall one tank driver, a B-24 pilot, several Marines, one of whom left a limb on Saipan, an Army ranger who began his tour of Italy at Anzio, and my dad who was Navy aviator. I don't recall any of them doing much other than caring for their wives and kids, going to work, grilling on the weekends, attending church on Sundays interspersed with naps on the couch.
Did I miss out on the trauma?
Posted by: R.Sherman | January 30, 2017 at 19:26
Did I miss out on the trauma?
If you spend enough time poking through the twisted mental wreckage of Everyday Feminism, you’ll spot the implication that Brown People’s Feelings™ have magical properties and are more authentic, and therefore more important, than the emotions experienced by people of pallor.
Posted by: David | January 30, 2017 at 19:33
Insofar as we are directly descended from 2,044 different people
Not necessarily different. Barring significant relocation by most of those generations, most people will find quite a few first, second, third once/twice/thrice removed cousins in their lineage such that the number of discrete (did I spell it right this time?) individuals is a bit less than 2044. Either way, though, quite a few.
Posted by: WTP | January 30, 2017 at 19:33
R.Sherman: I don't recall any of them doing much other than caring for their wives and kids, going to work, grilling on the weekends, attending church on Sundays interspersed with naps on the couch.
Yes, but what were they grilling?
Burnsie: descended from 2,044 different people
My quick check using excel (2^10) leads to 1,024. If you start the count from the parents' generation it would still have to be 2,048.
/pedantry
Posted by: Hedgehog | January 30, 2017 at 19:58
@Hedge
Pork Steaks.
Posted by: R.Sherman | January 30, 2017 at 20:06
ac1 -- I'll see your "Peak Stupid" and raise it.
#Science? Too discriminatory.Posted by: Darleen | January 30, 2017 at 20:45
WTP
Your friend might find this helpful:
http://thosewhocansee.blogspot.co.uk/2016/12/the-diversity-tax.html
Posted by: Theophrastus | January 30, 2017 at 20:56
British Medical Association
Not the British Monty Python Association?
Posted by: ac1 | January 30, 2017 at 21:48
My quick check using excel (2^10) leads to 1,024.
That would be the number of the 10th generation alone. I added all those who descended from them as well, generations 2-9. Can't ignore their trauma, now can we?
Posted by: Burnsie | January 30, 2017 at 21:51
My ancestors came to Australia chained in the hold of a convict ship. Somehow, my only emotional response to this is to wish I could say 'thank you'.
Where's my inter-generational trauma? I feel left out.
Posted by: Kerry | January 30, 2017 at 23:11
WTP:
Some people's family trees are straight as telephone poles.
Posted by: Ted S., Catskill Mtns., NY, USA | January 31, 2017 at 01:01
Actually although Lamarckism as originally framed is dead, there is evidence that some specific traits can be passed on epigenetically from various incidents in the life of a person. Example often quoted is that children born in Holland in the late 40's early 50's have some distinct genetic features that appear to originate from the fairly traumatic famine endured by many Dutch in 1945 before the war ended.
Gene expression can be altered by factors outside the the core DNA and that altered expression can apparently be passed on. A full understanding of this is yet to be achieved, but as far as I'm aware the effect is considered real and repeatable. An interesting field; which is utterly unlike Social Justice Studies.
Posted by: Ed Snack | January 31, 2017 at 02:26
For those who missed the update, . . .
Well, no, didn't miss it at all, had relevant issues to pay attention to instead.
Beyond that, one particular question does get raised by the description.
Regarding . . . “people of colour” can feel the emotions of their ancestors via “inter-generational trauma,” which is, we’re told, passed on “genetically” and “lives inside of your body.” . . .
There is a practice called a systemic constellation. However, what rather emphatically and immediately turns up in all constellations is that anyone can take part, personal DNA is irrelevant. And where usually there is a client who has a general or not so general question, sometimes an experiment where a set combination of factors gets looked at, anyone can be the focus of a constellation---European, African, Asian, inevitably mixed, purple, polka dotted, left handed, whatever.
How does it work? Aaaahhhh . . . the most I've ever encountered is immense and utter handwaving, where the one basic quite truthful assessment is, basically, we have no bloody idea how this works. What is known from absolute masses of repeat occurrences is what happens during a constellation.
Sooo, if what is being claimed by Sandra Kim is at all related to constellations, the closest description of any validity would be the emotions of their ancestors via “inter-generational trauma,” . . . beyond that, the rather established facts are that the rest remains rather unequivocal bullshit---particularly the passed on by DNA bit . . . Some constellation studies are of related concepts: One such that I sat in on involved assessing the several companies that the client might want to work at.
Posted by: Hal | January 31, 2017 at 02:52
I'm confused again. So would it be rude to ask a fat transgendered person if they were pregnant?
Posted by: WTP | January 31, 2017 at 02:59
I, too, am confused. As a person of pallor, would I be racist for eating a fajita? Or would I be racist for refusing to eat a fajita?
Posted by: Q30 | January 31, 2017 at 03:41
Q30,
Sorry, but as a person of pallor, you're racist no matter what you do or don't do. You were born that way.
/settled science
Posted by: Spiny Norman | January 31, 2017 at 03:50
I keep having to check that these people are real.
Posted by: dicentra | January 31, 2017 at 03:57
As a person of pallor, would I be racist for eating a fajita? Or would I be racist for refusing to eat a fajita?
Here's the fun part: "Fajita" and "chimichanga" are not real words in Spanish. They're gringo inventions for Mexican-like food that is served at Mexican-like restaurants in the USA and elsewhere.
Untangle THAT.
Posted by: dicentra | January 31, 2017 at 04:00
We can include intersex men and transmen who may get pregnant by saying 'pregnant people' instead of 'expectant mothers'.
Or we can just call them "seahorses."
Posted by: dicentra | January 31, 2017 at 04:01
Even Dr. Frankenstein knew better than to confuse xx with xy in his work.
Posted by: Hopp Singg | January 31, 2017 at 05:03
Somewhat related, the forthcoming “March for Science” doesn’t look entirely credible.
Posted by: David | January 31, 2017 at 06:37
And speaking of trauma:
Such was the alleged trauma of not being agreed with,
Because not indulging the opportunist psychodrama of a vain and weepy student now constitutes both “oppression” and “protecting the voices of the white students who benefit from black oppression,” albeit in ways never quite explained. Yes, black oppression - at an Ivy League university, where annual tuition is $44,000 and pro-black favouritism in admissions is proudly announced.
Posted by: David | January 31, 2017 at 07:40
the forthcoming “March for Science” doesn’t look entirely credible.
Posted by: sH2 | January 31, 2017 at 08:14
Absolutely.
Posted by: David | January 31, 2017 at 08:25
And speaking of trauma:
When can we start calling liberalism a cult? Tell me this kid isn't a victim of sophisticated conditioning techniques.
Paralyzed with victimhood while living one of the most privileged existences on the planet. Someone's done on number on him.
Posted by: Burnsie | January 31, 2017 at 11:12
Is this PeakStupid?
I think perhaps you've misunderstood Hadley's 'fashion' columns: they're tongue-in-cheek riffs. (Although I must say that a couple of my sober-suited male colleagues had noticed Pres. Trump's biggening ties.)
Posted by: Lisboeta | January 31, 2017 at 11:29
at an Ivy League university, where... pro-black favouritism in admissions is proudly announced.
There's your problem.
Posted by: [+] | January 31, 2017 at 11:38
There’s your problem.
It does seem to be the obvious variable, and one that has obvious consequences. As discussed here. See also the first item here.
Posted by: David | January 31, 2017 at 11:49
I know I should not be surprised anymore, but when did it become permissible for students to dictate the content and conduct of college courses, not to mention requiring a professor to confess various "sins" in order to have the authority to proceed?
Oh, and I particularly enjoy the emotional blackmail bit,too. "Do what I want or I'm going to cry."
Posted by: R.Sherman | January 31, 2017 at 12:53
"Fajita" and "chimichanga" are not real words in Spanish. They're gringo inventions for Mexican-like food
Oh, it gets even more confusing than that. Anyone old enough to remember (their parents favorite maybe) Dean Martin hit, "Hey, Mambo"? I found numerous problematicisms when looking up the lyrics this weekend...
But I think I missed a few.
Posted by: WTP | January 31, 2017 at 13:35
when did it become permissible for students to dictate the content and conduct of college courses, not to mention requiring a professor to confess various "sins" in order to have the authority to proceed?
China, 1966, if memory serves.
Posted by: Horace Dunn | January 31, 2017 at 13:36
problematicisms
Needs more clunk.
Posted by: David | January 31, 2017 at 13:39
Lemme offer a third opinion on some of the numbers presented.
You have 1024 ancestral slots at ten generations back
You have 2046 ancestral slots as sum over 1-10 generations back (the sum starting at 2+4+8... not 1+2+4+8...)
You almost certainly have fewer unique individuals in your family tree there, as some people fill multiple slots. How many fewer is very much a region-variable feature. Some parts of the world have consanguineous marriages as a cultural default, with marriages between second cousins or closer relatives comprising the majority of marriages. Others outlaw such unions, de facto or de jure, or have in the relevantly recent past.
Posted by: Microbillionaire | January 31, 2017 at 13:43
marriages between second cousins or closer relatives comprising the majority of marriages
With doubtless interesting, though politically unmentionable, genetic and intellectual (not to mention the subsequent social) consequences for the offspring and their progeny.
Posted by: jabrwok | January 31, 2017 at 14:10
...marriages between second cousins or closer relatives comprising the majority of marriages...
And that's a problem how, precisely?
Posted by: Queen Victoria | January 31, 2017 at 14:45
And that's a problem how, precisely?
Here in the UK, British parents of Pakistani origin, with high rates of consanguineous marriage, account for 3.4 per cent of all births nationwide, yet produce around 30 per cent of children born with recessive gene disorders.
That's a problem for several parties, not least the British taxpayer, precisely.
Posted by: Trevor | January 31, 2017 at 17:11
Will they claim it is all to do with epigenetics? In the good old days you could identify the woo by reference to quantum vibrations but this biology lark (lamark?) is something my BS detector is not calibrated to detect.
Here is some quick googling which I am not qualified to comment on:
http://upliftconnect.com/intergenerational-trauma/
"Intergenerational Trauma is the idea that serious trauma can affect the children and grandchildren of those who had the first hand experience, due to living with a person suffering from PTSD and the challenges that can bring. What’s new is that, thanks to the emerging field of epigenetics, science is discovering that trauma is being passed down to future generations through more than simply learned behaviours."
Posted by: I sneeze in threes | January 31, 2017 at 17:47
Though I'd argue that being brought up in a culture of persistent grievance mongering regarding your somewhat distant relatives is unlikely to instil a healthy view of life and in the little-uns.
Posted by: I sneeze in threes | January 31, 2017 at 17:50
Ooh apologies everyone, I must to more than a cursory scan of web-sites I link to, this seems woo central as can be seen by the other articles, e.g.
http://upliftconnect.com/using-fire-to-heal-purify/
"Fire can be used to enhance your spiritual practice or support you by helping you purify and set intentions in your own life. Many personal fire rituals are based on the ancient ceremonies handed down through the ages, in all cultures. Here are a few fire ceremonies from around the world."
Though on the positive maybe this is a new fun website for David to read when he needs a bit of me time with good red wine?
Posted by: I sneeze in threes | January 31, 2017 at 17:56
this seems woo central
I did wonder when you were going to notice. What with the adjacent advert for Water Is Sacred.
Though I’d argue that being brought up in a culture of persistent grievance mongering regarding your somewhat distant relatives is unlikely to instil a healthy view of life and in the little-uns.
Well, quite. I suspect the whiny self-preoccupation of such people can be explained by something more proximate and humdrum than the ghostly re-enactment of some distant ancestor’s slave woes.
Posted by: David | January 31, 2017 at 18:03
That's a problem for several parties, not least the British taxpayer, precisely.
Memo to self: Try to read yourself away from breaking up fistfights between Albert and John Brown to close the < tounge-in-cheek > tag.
Posted by: Queen Victoria, n/k/a "Vicki." | January 31, 2017 at 19:34
"Tear yourself away..." Bloody Auto-correct.
Posted by: Queen Victoria, n/k/a "Vicki." | January 31, 2017 at 19:36
Phew. One was worried for a moment there, Ma'am.
Posted by: Trevor | January 31, 2017 at 19:46
One was worried for a moment there, Ma'am.
Here's a finger bowl of gin. Knock yourself out. 😀
Posted by: Queen Victoria, n/k/a "Vicki." | January 31, 2017 at 19:57
"... the emerging field of epigenetics, science is discovering that trauma is being passed down to future generations through more than simply learned behaviours."
Is that anything like the way certain trees in certain Siberian subarctic groves are "teleconnected" to certain changes in global climate, as was claimed by the UEA CRU?
Woo Central, indeed.
Posted by: Spiny Norman | January 31, 2017 at 21:13
Woo Central, indeed.
And so, of course, is Everyday Feminism. It’s just New Age woo with a “social justice” tilt. For instance, this.
Posted by: David | January 31, 2017 at 22:33
another white space
Should have locked him in a broom closet and stuffed a towel under the door. Problem solved.
Brown People’s Feelings™ have magical properties and are more authentic
Who's browner, Turks or Armenians?
Posted by: Squires | January 31, 2017 at 23:25
Bloody Auto-correct.
Solution: Turn OFF Bloody Auto-correct.
Posted by: Geezer | February 01, 2017 at 00:06
"…children born in Holland in the late 40's early 50's have some distinct genetic features that appear to originate from the fairly traumatic famine endured by many Dutch in 1945 before the war ended."
Which presumably explains why their children are such weedy, stunted creatures that crack two metres' height only rarely. I don't think anyone's denying the existence of epigenetics, but something that's trotted out with quite such monotonous regularity is certainly over-hyped. And it would be a stretch to find the epigenetic markers for your grandfather having to drink from a separate water fountain.
Posted by: David Gillies | February 01, 2017 at 00:31
iSlam scores higher than being gay
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/317248-dnc-boots-candidate-from-chairmans-race-for-criticizing-ellisons-islamic
Posted by: ac1 | February 01, 2017 at 01:11
Hmmmm.
I feel a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of nails suddenly scraped across millions of blackboards, and were suddenly silenced.
Posted by: Hal | February 01, 2017 at 03:54
A person's experience as a child or teenager can have a profound impact on their future children's lives, new work is showing. Rachel Yehuda, a researcher in the growing field of epigenetics and the intergenerational effects of trauma, and her colleagues have long studied mass trauma survivors and their offspring. Their latest results reveal that descendants of people who survived the Holocaust have different stress hormone profiles than their peers, perhaps predisposing them to anxiety disorders.
I'm the son of a woman who, along with her sisters, was raped by her father. I'm here because she got pregnant deliberately to escape her home via shotgun marriage. She passed on to me a hatred/fear of men that stayed with me for years. It's also not great when, in your thirties, you realise that your grandfather may also be your father.
Environmentally trauma can easily be passed on. Bugger the genetics.
Posted by: Greg Allan | February 01, 2017 at 08:34
Who's browner, Turks or Armenians?
Simply apply the rules of victimhood poker:
Armenians - Brown
Turks - Brown
= A tie.
Armenians - Christian
Turks - Muslim
= Armenians lose.
See, it's simple!
Posted by: Jonathan | February 01, 2017 at 10:12
Oh dear . . .
Cultural appropriation is occurring in multiple locations!!!!!
Let the protests begin.
Posted by: Hal | February 01, 2017 at 14:46