Myron Magnet on ‘progressive’ policy versus the skills of city living:
Civility — the art of living in a city — is not innate. We have to learn to stand in line and take our turn, not to blast music from our apartment or car, not to block the sidewalk or market aisle, not to yell on our cell phones, not to litter, not to monopolise public spaces with our “expressive” behaviour, not to bother or offend others unnecessarily. We no longer teach civility in schools: instead of the “citizenship” that my generation learned, we impart “social justice,” which teaches grievance and resentment of others; and city officials, with an Obama edict’s backing, have hamstrung school discipline, fostering misbehaviour. In college, we don’t teach free and civil discussion, tolerance of intellectual differences, or respect for learning, but only a kid’s right to resent microaggressions and silence politically incorrect speech as “violence.” The result will not be urbanity.
And further to this item here, Professor Charles H F Davis returns to the public eye:
A University of Southern California professor says he stands behind his tweets that… call for whiteness to be “destroyed,” and the promotion of violence against the “white supremacist heterosexist patriarchy.”
“White supremacist heterosexist patriarchy needs to get the violence it imparts,” says the professor, who invokes “black rage” as a self-validating phenomenon, a kind of moral mic-drop, as if anger were synonymous with righteousness. “Whiteness and white supremacy,” he adds, “must be, by any and all means, destroyed.” This bold, if adolescent, proclamation is followed, belatedly, by a denial of cultivating racial acrimony, and an assurance that “whiteness,” which the professor despises and wishes to see “eradicated,” is “neither synonymous with nor exclusive to white people.” Which I’m sure is a great comfort to any melanin-deficient students in the professor’s proximity, and whose concerns regarding such language are dismissed as “white fragility.” Readers may wish to ponder how such assurances can be squared with the professor’s chosen Twitter banner, or his endorsement via Twitter of sentiments such as these.
Added: Somewhat relevant.
As usual, feel free to share your own links and snippets, on any subject, in the comments.
Readers may wish to ponder how such assurances can be squared with the professor’s chosen Twitter banner, or his endorsement, via Twitter, of sentiments such as this.
SJWs always lie.
Posted by: Clam | October 27, 2017 at 09:20
Priorities:
Because that hokey, question-begging leftism must always come first, using class time that someone else is paying for.
Posted by: David | October 27, 2017 at 09:26
SJWs always lie.
I’d say it’s a safe bet that this one does.
Our professional educator and proponent of “social justice” seems fixated with racial violence and annihilationist sentiment, such that he endorses a fellow academic’s tweet in which a massacre of white people is described as a “good thing indeed,” and whose author declares his enthusiasm for “white genocide.” Professor Davis then dismisses concerns regarding these fixations and endorsements as mere “white fragility.” And he does all this while expecting us to believe that he bears no animosity whatsoever towards those of us with low levels of melanin.
Posted by: David | October 27, 2017 at 09:39
In what city does Myron live that residents learn not to blast "music" from an apartment? I want to live there!
Posted by: Pogonip | October 27, 2017 at 11:13
You note, Professor Davis "return[s] to the public eye." Wherever he's been, I rather doubt it included, oh say, assisting those displaced by the hurricanes in Houston or Puerto Rico, where "white supremacist heterosexual patriarchy" was on copious display in the form of the myriad of Nitro bass boats used to rescue fellow citizens trapped by flood waters.
Posted by: R. Sherman | October 27, 2017 at 11:56
"Asked if he’s worried his tweets may rub some of his students the wrong way and might lead them to believe he is biased, Davis said creating discomfort is a tool that aids learnin..."
Unless, of course, that discomfort originates with someone I dislike, such as Ben Shapiro . . .
Posted by: R. Sherman | October 27, 2017 at 12:03
Unless, of course, that discomfort originates with someone I dislike, such as Ben Shapiro . . .
If they didn't have double standards they'd have no standards at all.
Posted by: Clam | October 27, 2017 at 12:33
Like so many of his Angry Studies peers, Professor Davis has found an environment in which his nasty racist fantasies and general moral delinquency are not only tolerated but deemed statusful and funded. It’s a cushy number in which he gets paid to peddle pernicious horseshit and racial neuroticism, despite the fact that his ‘teaching’ will likely have a negative effect on the life chances and happiness of his credulous students, and then ripple outwards from there.
And it occurs to me that a civilisation that allows its children to be educated by its self-declared enemies may be in for a surprise.
Posted by: David | October 27, 2017 at 12:42
...a civilisation that allows its children to be educated by its self-declared enemies may be in for a surprise.
The process is a slow one, but I think the hoi polloi are beginning to catch on. For too long, many of these universities have traded on their names and the cachet of having a those names on a degree. Parents ultimately control where their children attend college, inasmuch as their participation is required in order for students to qualify for financial aid, not to mention writing checks for the "expected family contribution." If I want my sons to be brow-beaten for four years, I'll hustle them off to a U.S. Marine Corps recruiter. They'll actually learn something and it won't cost me a dime.
Posted by: R. Sherman | October 27, 2017 at 13:45
any melanin-deficient students... whose concerns regarding such language are dismissed as “white fragility.”
Microaggression! Hate speech! I feel unsafe!
Oh that crap only goes one way...
Posted by: Joan | October 27, 2017 at 14:08
Oh that crap only goes one way...
Bingo.
Posted by: David | October 27, 2017 at 14:24
Bingo
I've never understood the "emotional labor" craze or the idea that being genuinely interested in someone else's background, especially where it's different from one's own, is somehow insulting. How else then are we supposed to learn about each other and reach an understanding of our common humanity?
I recall a few years back when I happened to wake up in an intensive care unit at a large teaching hospital. One of my attending nurses was a lovely young lady with a vague British accent. She happened to be black. Over the course of the few days I was there, she and I had some marvelous conversations about her upbringing in Zimbabwe. It was an enjoyable time and she told me that I was one of the few people who seemed actually interested in her as a person. I may be all wet, but I attribute my recovery in substantial part to her care and those conversations. Query, was that "emotional labor" on her part?
I suppose, we should just shut up and let the likes of Professor Davis lecture us all on what our responses to our fellow humans should be, based solely on their melanin levels.
Posted by: R. Sherman | October 27, 2017 at 14:41
Statement in part by the USC Admin in response to twitter comments by Davis:
".....USC does not condone violence or threats of violence in any form.”
A University of Southern California professor says he stands behind his tweets that include obscenities directed toward President Donald Trump, calls for whiteness to be “destroyed,” and the promotion of violence against the “white supremacist heterosexist patriarchy.”
And might I add the police as well.... or is that the same as the patriarchy.
-----------
American blacks (Afro-Americans) have been in the U.S. for several hundred years,some longer than 300 years. That's at least 15 generations. Over that time period miscegenation has indeed taken place. (Thomas Jefferson?) And today, judging by TV programming, commercials, and social media which seem to encourage this racial mixing, I will surmise that many believe it is a way to solve our racial problems.
Mr. Davis (by appearance), Mr. Obama and Mr. Kopaernick (by fact) all are examples of miscegenation (the Kardasians, Beyonce, as well) Yet this has not solved anything ... or so it seems.
When I was a very young man my good friend's father was very much anti-black. One day I pointed out to him that most American Blacks were of at least some degree mixed racially. His response was "that's why they're so mean." That ended the conversation. But it did make an impression.
Random thoughts.....
Posted by: Anniemouse | October 27, 2017 at 15:35
"I've never understood the 'emotional labor' craze..."
Posted by: pst314 | October 27, 2017 at 16:45
"Professor Charles H F Davis returns to the public eye"
It's all fun and games and social experimentation/engineering until someone loses an eye.
Posted by: PiperPaul | October 27, 2017 at 17:02
I’ve never understood the ‘emotional labor’ craze...
According to the terribly oppressed Laurie Penny, “emotional labour” includes remembering that your partner has allergies.
Posted by: David | October 27, 2017 at 17:03
According to the terribly oppressed Laurie Penny, “emotional labour” includes remembering that your partner has allergies.
I pity the man, woman or polyamorous non-binary queer-spirit she ends up with when she's forty.
Posted by: Connor | October 27, 2017 at 18:31
And it occurs to me that a civilisation that allows its children to be educated by its self-declared enemies may be in for a surprise.
Indeed. Either the left has got to go or our civilization will.
Posted by: pst314 | October 27, 2017 at 18:45
I pity the man, woman or polyamorous non-binary queer-spirit she ends up with when she’s forty.
It’s not just allergies, of course. Remembering your partner’s birthday, that’s unbearably oppressive, too. And cooking a meal, obviously. And cleaning up even occasionally is an outrage too far. Oh, and remembering to feed the children. These things and many, many more are both personally crushing and an affront to Laurie’s intersectional feminism.
Posted by: David | October 27, 2017 at 18:48
Not to be outdone by their comrades in California, the nitwits at the University of Kansas hires a BLM "activist" who had already been banned from other parts of the campus, and who also appears not to be fond of those less melanated than his own bad self.
Posted by: Farnsworth M Muldoon | October 27, 2017 at 18:58
If your culture didn't have a written language until white people came along, you need to sit this one out.
NSFW NSFW NSFW NSFW NSFW NSFW NSFW NSFW
NSFW NSFW NSFW NSFW NSFW NSFW NSFW NSFW
Ohhhhh, no . . . you watched it, didn't you?
Posted by: Monty James | October 27, 2017 at 19:07
Ohhhhh, no . . . you watched it, didn’t you?
I’m… not familiar with the kind of thing I’m seeing.
Posted by: David | October 27, 2017 at 19:24
Ah, a generous glass of red. This should dull the trauma from watching all that bare-breasted liveliness.
Wine goes with pizza, yeah?
Posted by: David | October 27, 2017 at 19:52
If your culture didn't have a written language until white people came along, you need to sit this one out.
The irony that all the "post-colonial" authors they want to "study" are apparently writing in English seems to be lost on the poor put-upon dears.
I’m… not familiar with the kind of thing I’m seeing.
You need to get out more...
Posted by: Farnsworth M Muldoon | October 27, 2017 at 19:57
Wine certainly helps out with Bare Breasted Stress Disorder.
Posted by: Monty James | October 27, 2017 at 20:13
Wine goes with pizza, yeah?
A fine Chianti works. Less'n you drank it all with the last SJW's liver.
Posted by: WTP | October 27, 2017 at 20:16
If your culture didn't have a written language until white people came along, you need to sit this one out.
Finally. Hear, hear!!
It's utterly long overdue for the English language to become free of such clearly foreign and colonizing intrusions such as William Shakespeare.
Posted by: Hal | October 27, 2017 at 20:17
You need to get out more...
I'm confused. The title says,"Girl Street Fight in London," but the police uniforms say "Austin." Is that some West End neighborhood, with which I'm not familiar?
As for KU, my ancestors knew that place is hell on earth in the middle of the 19th century.
Posted by: R. Sherman | October 27, 2017 at 20:21
BTW, this thread has taken a strange turn.
Posted by: R. Sherman | October 27, 2017 at 20:22
BTW, this thread has taken a strange turn.
Unlike all those others.
Posted by: David | October 27, 2017 at 20:24
Heh...All those NSFW's and I go and watch it here at work...Fortunately (?) they owe me about 6 weeks back pay so...feeling a little liberal, iykwim.
Posted by: WTP | October 27, 2017 at 20:24
Wine certainly helps out with Bare Breasted Stress Disorder.
It’s a two-glass trauma.
Posted by: David | October 27, 2017 at 20:35
It’s a two-glass trauma.
Two hands on the stemware, it reduces the shaking.
Posted by: Monty James | October 27, 2017 at 20:45
...Bare Breasted Stress Disorder...
Yet another fine band name.
Posted by: Farnsworth M. Muldoon | October 27, 2017 at 21:03
Intelligence is (a) white privilege.
Posted by: john b | October 27, 2017 at 21:09
Unlike all those others.
Well, to be honest, when I started visiting these pages, the tone was a bit more, shall we say, "elevated." Which is not to imply a correlation between my visits and bare-breasted cat fight videos.
Posted by: R. Sherman | October 27, 2017 at 21:11
Which is not to imply a correlation between my visits and bare-breasted cat fight videos.
Posted by: pst314 | October 27, 2017 at 21:17
Well, to be honest, when I started visiting these pages, the tone was a bit more, shall we say, “elevated.”
Yes, that extensive collection of navel fluff, linked in 2008, really set the classy tone.
Posted by: David | October 27, 2017 at 21:37
I think by the end of the fracas there was more than just bare boobz; she lost control of all of her ensemble. Quite the accomplishment.
She should meet this guy
Posted by: PiperPaul | October 27, 2017 at 22:23
Cambridge University English academics may be forced to include more ethnic writers in an effort to 'decolonise' the curriculum for students
Wait, I'm confused... Isn't a university in England studying authors from England pretty much the opposite of curricular colonialism?
Posted by: The original Mr. X | October 28, 2017 at 00:44
and whose concerns regarding such language are dismissed as “white fragility.”
Which is it, "white supremacy" or "white fragility?" Make up your mind...
Posted by: champ | October 28, 2017 at 01:14
Thanks for sharing...
Posted by: Kate Eliys | October 28, 2017 at 01:21
How do people become as selfish as Laurie? Most of us help our families, at least, whether out of instinct, noblesse oblige, or the despairing knowledge that, no matter how tired you are, the baby is not going to stop yowling until you get up and change his soaked diaper and sleeper (and after all, he can't very well do it himself). I can't even say she sounds inhuman. Dog and cat mothers eat their offsprings' poop for the first week or so--a perk for a dog, I suppose, but probably pretty disgusting if you're a cat. I guess we could say Laurie sounds alien? As long as she's happy, I guess it's OK as long as she doesn't reproduce and inflict herself on a baby.
Posted by: Pogonip | October 28, 2017 at 01:41
Yale ‘decolonizes’ English dept. after complaints studying white authors ‘actively harms’ students
Empires dissolve and peoples disappear, song passes not away.
William Watson
National Review Online: Conservatives Should Reconsider Their Opposition to Hip-Hop
Goddamnit.
Posted by: Monty James | October 28, 2017 at 03:31
Ohhhhh, no . . . you watched it, didn’t you?
I’m… not familiar with the kind of thing I’m seeing.
Oh, the camera operator was just being up front about keeping abreast of things. And getting behind the spirit of the moment.
Posted by: Hal | October 28, 2017 at 07:07
National Review Online: Conservatives Should Reconsider Their Opposition to Hip-Hop
Goddamnit.
Such Language!!!
And aside from following up that straight line . . . . Weeeeeellllllll . . . .
Actually, no, mainly because rap is not music and therefore musical discussion of rap is impossible.
In my case, I've always simply lacked any interest whatsoever because if I wanted to be utterly bored with random chanting that occurs with equally boring random non verbal noise, then I would turn on the news, stick a pot under a dripping faucet, and get the exact same result(1).
Beyond that, as far as any content in rap, as is noted constantly, For you will always have the hipster among you,and in noting that, just because hipsters insist on being hipsters---or rappers---there is no reason anyone else needs bother. Shakespeare can be performed on street corners, and Richard Burton had a party trick of reciting Shakespeare backwards, but as David keeps pointing out, merely using a microphone on a stage does not produce or demonstrate being an artist.
(1) A number of years back I was explaining Unix and multitasking to a couple of coworkers who kept getting very confused between rap and music. First, I noted that humans create music---and yes there are the discussions of animals making music---, but getting a computer to try and make music had, at the time, only gotten some rather spot on reproductions of Schoenberg.
Absolutely by contrast, I noted to them that in Unix one can set up a script where assorted random text can be fed through a speech synthesizer, say, a phone book or tax regulations. In parallel, one can have the computer generate some very random loop of noise and have it repeat endlessly, say about eight beats, repeat, eight beats, repeat. Finally, what one has the computer do is to broadcast this recitation of the phone book or tax regulations in unison with the looping noise, and thus one has succeeded in having the computer crank out very obvious, undeniable rap, entirely at whim, without having to waste money paying for some overpriced shiny drink coaster and accompanying publicity packaging.
Once my coworkers absorbed the new concepts, I started seeing expressions of absolute horror.
No . . no . . no, no, That's Not funny, man!!!
Okaaaay, but I wasn't being "funny", I was just explaining the advantages of modern computers.
No, man, we mean it!!! That's Not funny man!!!!!
Oy.
In the meantime, at some point I did come up with the idea of the world's most boring sight gag;
Liberace plays rap.
Just think; The stage lights up, the piano is covered in sequins, the candelabra is glittering, Liberace comes sweeping out on stage, big smile, big smile, hands over the piano keys, Aaaaaaand-----Tunk! Tunk tunk tunk, T-tunk, tunk tunktunktunk, tunk. Tunk Tunk.
Talk about a one note performance.
Literally.
Posted by: Hal | October 28, 2017 at 07:24
. . . if I wanted to be utterly bored with random chanting that occurs with equally boring random non verbal noise, then I would turn on the news, stick a pot under a dripping faucet, and get the exact same result.
And The Ship Sails On.
Posted by: Hal | October 28, 2017 at 07:38
USC does not condone violence or threats of violence in any form.
Evidently it does. The man is paid a salary to mouth these things, and variations thereof. As the professor, a self-declared activist puts it, he “teaches about resistance.” Though I suppose there’s the question of how, exactly, the professor plans to inflict “violence” on an apparently all-powerful and all-pervasive conspiracy, such that it is “destroyed” and “eradicated” – a conspiracy, incidentally, that he struggles to define in any meaningful way, and whose allegedly crushing practical effects aren’t illustrated with even a single credible example.
Posted by: David | October 28, 2017 at 08:29
. . . a conspiracy, incidentally, that he struggles to define in any meaningful way, and whose allegedly crushing practical effects aren’t illustrated with even a single credible example.
Oh, nonsense. Of course the conspiracy exists!!!
Posted by: Hal | October 28, 2017 at 09:10
Ohhhhh, no . . . you watched it, didn't you?
Ahh, those charming Southern Belles....
Posted by: Jonathan | October 28, 2017 at 10:03
From Cosmopolitan, a trade journal for sluts:
http://www.cosmopolitan.com/lifestyle/a13069023/moana-halloween-costume-racist
I think what's happening here is the normal female instinct "make sure the kids don't hurt themselves while having fun" has become perverted and is manifesting as "make sure the kids don't have any fun." Something about 21st-century life twists and perverts normal human instincts.
I sure hope that something isn't the Internet, which I happen to use every day, not only to keep an eye on important things like Ephemera, but to get paid at my job.
Posted by: Pogonip | October 28, 2017 at 12:05
Liberace plays rap.
Pat Boone covers Little Richard.#whiteculturalabomination
Posted by: Farnsworth M Muldoon | October 28, 2017 at 13:10
Re Pat Boone, I dig how he snaps his fingers on his right hand, then his left, then goes back and forth throughout the song. A real cool cat, daddy-o.
Posted by: WTP | October 28, 2017 at 14:18
Pat Boone covers Little Richard.
I don’t think I’m ever going to forgive you for that.
From Cosmopolitan, a trade journal for sluts:
Setting aside the numbing idiocies of identity politics, aren’t they rather missing the point that Hallowe’en – when children dress up as witches, vampires, the undead, etc., and demand sweets from strangers - is meant to be a little transgressive? Isn’t that the spirit of it?
Posted by: David | October 28, 2017 at 14:20
I don’t think I’m ever going to forgive you for that.
#notedfamilyappropriateswitheculture
Posted by: Farnsworth M Muldoon | October 28, 2017 at 14:43
"animals making music"
This otter be interesting ('borrowed' from Twitter)...
https://streamable.com/8e2kh
Posted by: PiperPaul | October 28, 2017 at 15:00
Toby Young encounters our educational establishment. It turns out that politely questioning the egalitarian ‘blank slate’ assumptions that many leftist educators “believe to be true” – but which obviously aren’t - must not be permitted.
Via Ben Sixsmith.
Posted by: David | October 28, 2017 at 15:27
If your culture didn't have a written language until white people came along, you need to sit this one out.
I notice the Daily Mail's list of 'ethnic' writers for English courses includes one who wrote in Spanish.
Posted by: MC | October 28, 2017 at 15:38
Western civilisation was rather nice while it lasted.
Posted by: Charlie Suet | October 28, 2017 at 16:04
If anyone has trouble with comments not appearing, email me and I’ll poke the spam filter.
Posted by: David | October 28, 2017 at 16:13
Steve Sailer on the dull, unpleasant mind of Ta-Nehisi Coates:
I also like the term dorm-lounge performance art.
Posted by: David | October 28, 2017 at 16:18
"...I'll poke the spam filter..."
If it continues to act up threaten to throw pickled "eggs" at it.
Posted by: Pogonip | October 28, 2017 at 17:01
It has always put MY golden nuggets of wisdom right through, by the way, so there can't be too much wrong with it.
Posted by: Pogonip | October 28, 2017 at 17:03
Does the spam filter ever poke back?
Posted by: pst314 | October 28, 2017 at 17:20
For some reason, she’s taken a dislike to MC.
Posted by: David | October 28, 2017 at 17:41
Jessie Daniels is a sociologist and, she says, “an expert on race.”
Posted by: David | October 28, 2017 at 18:29
Fan club.
Posted by: Hal | October 28, 2017 at 18:36
Muldoon's first link shows, on the right, a link to a "Cocks not Glocks" protest. Showing what democracy looks like means, apparently, shrill twats waving dildos in the air.
Posted by: QuintAmpersandJessel | October 28, 2017 at 21:18
Don't point that thing unless you intend to use it! 😄
Posted by: Pogonip | October 28, 2017 at 22:09
Such Language!!!
First, I'd better apologize to Hal and everyone else for my bad language.
Second, I shall decline herein to comment further, because the Twitter post to which David linked inspires me to more bad language, an ocean current, a volcano, a bee swarm of bad language.
Seriously, how do we get along in a society with these plain lunatics and blaggards?
Posted by: Monty James | October 29, 2017 at 01:35
More from Professor Jessie Daniels.
Note that it’s hard to reconcile her sentiments with the claim, by Professor Davis, that the hated phenomenon of “whiteness” is “neither synonymous with nor exclusive to white people.” It seems that white families are the only ones that should be discouraged from existing.
Professor Daniels is employed by Hunter College and the Graduate Centre, CUNY.
Posted by: David | October 29, 2017 at 07:49
Remember, students. If you’re white and marry a white person and then have white children, you’re “part of the problem.”
Posted by: David | October 29, 2017 at 08:15
No. If you’re white and you pay the taxes that support this BS, you’re part of the problem.
Posted by: WTP | October 29, 2017 at 11:02
If you’re white...you’re “part of the problem.”
Brevity is the soul of wit.
The Left really seems to want a race war.
Posted by: jabrwok | October 29, 2017 at 11:49
No. If you’re white and you pay the taxes that support this BS, you’re part of the problem.
Alas, being a gainfully employed Person of Pallor means that taxes are not an option, nor is how that tax money gets spent.
The Left really seems to want a race war.
The puzzling bit is that seeing as how most of those calling for it seem to be Persons of Pallor, such as Miss Jessie above, how exactly do they think it would end up for themselves if their side won ?
Posted by: Farnsworth M Muldoon | October 29, 2017 at 12:41
Note well, however, that if a white person chooses to marry and procreate with someone of a different race, that is also "problematic" as it seeks to "exotify" the other race and constitutes participating in "genocide" by diluting the other race's "purity." And, of course, the non-white spouse is also a "race traitor," as well.
Good times.
Posted by: R. Sherman | October 29, 2017 at 12:47
There recently was viral video where college students swooned over "Bernie Sanders's" tax plan, only to be told it was Donald Trump's. It would be interesting to do a similar experiment by reworking the Nuremberg Laws with SJW/Progressive language and seeing how the likes of Professor Daniels would react.
Posted by: R. Sherman | October 29, 2017 at 13:03
taxes are not an option, nor is how that tax money gets spent.
Where you live, who you vote for, who you support monetarily and socially is well within your control.
Posted by: WTP | October 29, 2017 at 13:18
Where you live, who you vote for, who you support monetarily and socially is well within your control.
To a degree. I live in a very red state in South Flyoverlandia, but regardless of for whom I vote, I don't get a say in which moonbats our public universities hire.
Posted by: Farnsworth M Muldoon | October 29, 2017 at 13:38
I don't get a say in which moonbats our public universities hire.
See also, "Deep State."
Posted by: R. Sherman | October 29, 2017 at 14:39
And right on cue.
Posted by: R. Sherman | October 29, 2017 at 14:44
Remember, students. If you’re white and marry a white person and then have white children, you’re “part of the problem.”
Posted by: Jonathan | October 29, 2017 at 14:55
And right on cue.
Indeed. If they hadn't abandoned the core, the person who wrote this would have known it is "curricula".
Posted by: Farnsworth M. Muldoon | October 29, 2017 at 15:15
jabrwok,
The Left really seems to want a race war.
>_<
[Charles Manson's maniacal laughter echos through his San Quentin cell block.]
Posted by: Spiny Norman | October 29, 2017 at 15:29
To be fair to Coates (perhaps too fair, because nothing I have read from him shows any recognition he has sussed the real problem; certainly Sailer hasn't figured it out), that the cop was black has nothing to do with the moral of the Tale.
The melanin count of the police officer is irrelevant to what is really going on: the police and the citizens of black communities are cats in a sack, both driven to a fight that neither started. Which I further discuss here. (I can't be accused of blog flogging, the lights went out on that one a few years ago.)
The reason I think Coates is fundamentally clueless is that Balko reports a very convincing account that the problems in the St. Louis area are driven by blatantly racist policies that are now, thankfully, virtually unthinkable.
The marks they left aren't going to disappear overnight. Coates, by insisting that the situation of blacks in the US is essentially permanent, is showing he hasn't, or can't, give the real problem any serious thought.
Posted by: Jeff Guinn | October 29, 2017 at 15:49
The next pickled egg is on me.
Posted by: Jeff Guinn | October 29, 2017 at 15:52
[ Stirs jar of murky brine. ]
The bits add flavour.
Posted by: David | October 29, 2017 at 15:53
Meanwhile, speaking of murky brine, in the world of art, The Powerful Reason Why This Artist Has Been Saving His Urine For The Last 200 Days". (Link to Puffingtonhost and probably NSFW for language and a couple of photos)
Why, you ask, did this titan of art, who is apparently also channeling Moe Howard, feel compelled to do this ?
To be fair, it doesn't seem insane, but I am sure a cube of urine in an obscure NY "art" museum will change the minds of everyone in East Sasquatch, Iowa about this vital subject.
Posted by: Farnsworth M. Muldoon | October 29, 2017 at 16:06
Well, he has certainly changed MY mind.
Posted by: Pogonip | October 29, 2017 at 16:35
Perhaps on November 8 all those screaming people in Boston, New York and Philadelphia could douse themselves with Cassils' collected precious bodily fluid resources to demonstrate how really (literally) pissed they are.
Posted by: PiperPaul | October 29, 2017 at 17:25
Someone probably ought to take the role of parent here;
http://www.williamofockham.com/2017/10/29/someone-probably-needs-to-take-the-role-of-parent-here/
Posted by: Transaustraliaexpress | October 29, 2017 at 19:41
Someone probably ought to take the role of parent here;
Related, an alleged assistant professor of fairy tales thinks her four year old is in one of her clases, evidently.
Froze, I tells ya, but I am not sure why a pig being pink is an issue, unless it is that pink pigs have white privilege or something.
Feminist spark of fairy tales. Right.
Right, that is exactly what they were thinking back in the early 1800s.
I had a cat like that once, had to take it to sensitivity training the way it kept eyeballing my girlfriends.
I never cease to be amazed at what the perpetually offended will take umbrage with next.
Posted by: Farnsworth M. Muldoon | October 29, 2017 at 20:26
That's not how debate works. That's not how any debate works:
Wrong opinion, considerately removed for the sake of debate:
Are there any limits to what schools can achieve?
Posted by: Monty James | October 29, 2017 at 23:12
Judge recalls key rulings from his 50 years on federal bench
Posted by: Hal | October 30, 2017 at 01:04
How a Runaway Nun Helped an Outlaw Monk Change the World
Posted by: Hal | October 30, 2017 at 04:54
Earlier this year, Peter Salovey, the president of Yale, announced that the university will rename a residential college that was named for John C. Calhoun, because Calhoun’s “legacy as a white supremacist and a national leader who passionately promoted slavery as a ‘positive good’ fundamentally conflicts with Yale’s mission and values.” This move, which was not without its critics, was emblematic of a broader trend to look back skeptically at individuals who were venerated in earlier epochs, and ask how they should be judged by the moral standards of today. At Oxford, a Rhodes Scholar from South Africa recently led a campaign to take down a statue of Cecil Rhodes.
One great fortune—and reputation—that has evaded such scrutiny is that of the Sacklers, a family whose dubious business practices are not an artifact of previous centuries but an ongoing reality. If present statistics are any indication, in the time it likely took you to read this article six Americans have fatally overdosed on opioids. Yet Yale appears to be in no hurry to rename its Raymond and Beverly Sackler Institute for Biological, Physical and Engineering Sciences, or its Richard Sackler and Jonathan Sackler Professorship of Internal Medicine. Perhaps it’s because the Sacklers, unlike the Calhoun family, still have a fortune to give away.
Long, but worth a read.
Posted by: Lancastrian Oik | October 30, 2017 at 13:36