Hey, it was this or nothing at all. But by all means throw together your own pile of links and oddities in the comments. I’ll set the ball rolling with some balloons in Albuquerque; a dog that’s mastered invisibility; immune cell migration in the zebrafish inner ear; Nanjing, China, circa 1929; conversational robots; and, via Julia, some pulp cover treatments of classic novels.
Oh, and the no-strings one-time date you’ve always wanted.
...the no-strings one-time date you’ve always wanted.
I note, the date in quo plans to return to Florida once the current unpleasantness is sorted out. "Florida Man" is becoming an invasive species.
Posted by: R. Sherman | May 11, 2018 at 00:52
It isn't a new thing apparently.
'Historians have traced the concept of toxic masculinity in the Western world back to the Victorian era, particularly in public schools.'
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-05-11/toxic-masculinity-and-steve-biddulph-tips-for-raising-boys/9745760
Posted by: Black Ball | May 11, 2018 at 01:25
the concept of toxic masculinity in the Western world back to the Victorian era
Games playing and fitness are problematic?
Uh, no.
The infuriating thing about that article is the :::ahem::: toxic mixture of good (strength, physical vigor) with bad (violent) ... as if it is all one and the same. BAD ...
argh
Posted by: Darleen | May 11, 2018 at 02:36
Well, it’s about time you wrote about cell migration in the zebrafish inner ear! What took you so long?
I remember a lot of those book covers from the library.
Posted by: Pogonip | May 11, 2018 at 03:39
I gotta say Tim Winton does not look like he knows a whole lot about masculinity, todic or otherwise.
Posted by: Pogonip | May 11, 2018 at 03:41
Er, toxic.
Posted by: Pogonip | May 11, 2018 at 03:42
The Victorian era? How about the Spartan era?
Posted by: Fred the Fourth | May 11, 2018 at 04:09
Over at Ace's, delusional landwhale fixated on Harry Potter goes seeking conflict, finds it. Because the fat are *entitled* to *rollercoasters*. Apparently.
http://ace.mu.nu/archives/375203.php
Posted by: Sporkatus | May 11, 2018 at 05:19
Who's a clever boy?
https://www.thedodo.com/close-to-home/dog-buys-treats-using-leaf
Posted by: Jen | May 11, 2018 at 06:29
From the rabbit hole I fell in going over to Ace's:
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/993513778653290497.html
Best smack-down of a "check your privilege" social justice warrior I've seen in some time.
Posted by: Spiny Norman | May 11, 2018 at 06:41
Morning, all.
the date in quo plans to return to Florida once the current unpleasantness is sorted out.
It’s the boggling escalation as the story unfolds, from “Ooh, 500 text messages a day - she sounds keen” to “she wanted to wear his body parts and bathe in his blood.”
So is that what online dating is like, then?
Posted by: David | May 11, 2018 at 06:45
Oh, lawdy. I checked out the @RexValachorum Twitter feed, and a actual, live " Ceausescu nostalgic" is telling him that the deservedly dead Romanian despot's crimes against his own country are "LIES, LIES, LIES!"
[ headdesk ]
Posted by: Spiny Norman | May 11, 2018 at 06:54
The infuriating thing about that article is the :::ahem::: toxic mixture of good (strength, physical vigor) with bad (violent) ... as if it is all one and the same
The repeated failure to acknowledge such distinctions does rather suggest other motives may be in play. See also the last item here.
Posted by: David | May 11, 2018 at 07:14
You gotta feel sorry for the people who bought some of those books, especially the ones who bought the books by Joyce and Sartre.
Posted by: Hector Drummond, Vile Novelist | May 11, 2018 at 07:35
@Hector Drummond
In fairness, Portrait of the Artist isn't particularly challenging.
Posted by: George | May 11, 2018 at 07:50
conversational robots
*That's* not going to be used by scammers straight away, is it?
Posted by: John D | May 11, 2018 at 08:31
*That’s* not going to be used by scammers straight away, is it?
It does practically invite misuse. I mean, it’s technically impressive (albeit under what I presume are ideal and very limited circumstances), but the issue that comes to mind is trust. As noted here, people may prefer to know in advance whether or not they’re speaking to a human, rather than clever software.
Posted by: David | May 11, 2018 at 08:50
Leave Thursday open people. Or whatever you identify as this week.
'Indeed, no battle can be won in isolation. We all need to keep strengthening alliances, especially when we need to ensure safety, fight violence, lobby for legal change, and/or campaign to change hearts and minds.'
So when your next university guest speaker has their event disrupted, remember it is only a 'campaign to change hearts and minds'. With violence. Can I get off the planet now, it was a good ride whilst it lasted.
http://dayagainsthomophobia.org/worldwide-lgbt-organisations-elect-alliances-for-solidarity-as-2018-global-theme/
Posted by: Black Ball | May 11, 2018 at 10:16
>In fairness, Portrait of the Artist isn't particularly challenging.
No, but it's pretty dull. At least Ulysses has some lively sections.
Posted by: Hector Drummond, Vile Novelist | May 11, 2018 at 10:34
What - people don't enjoy being lectured about life by 5 year-olds in adolescent bodies? What has the world come to?
"We are in the throes of a moral panic engineered by children. Dangerous children. Children with their grubby little fingers on the levels of power."
Posted by: PiperPaul | May 11, 2018 at 10:40
Historians have traced the concept of "toxic masculinity" in the Western world back to the Victorian era, particularly in public schools.
Misrepresenting Masculinity
Posted by: Marion Morrison | May 11, 2018 at 10:50
Who's a clever boy?
By people clearly perpetuating racism, capitalism, and speciesism. They should be denounced.
Guy Gibson's dog was unavailable for comment.
Posted by: Farnsworth M Muldoon | May 11, 2018 at 11:25
She also said that she wanted to wear his body parts and bathe in his blood.
And people say that romance is dead.
Posted by: Franklin | May 11, 2018 at 11:26
Actually, most of those pulp book covers aren't seriously misrepresenting the content, but "Darkness at Noon" - WTF?
Posted by: JML | May 11, 2018 at 11:27
The repeated failure to acknowledge such distinctions does rather suggest other motives may be in play.
They shout that they want to rid the West of "toxic masculinity". Why would one assume it is the "toxic", rather than the "masculinity", that they wish to see done away with?
There is no lie like a lie of omission - and that applies as well to the lies one tells oneself.
Posted by: Squires | May 11, 2018 at 11:42
It was inevitable.
On the one hand, "Yay, Capitalism !" On the other, enough, already.
I suppose that is better than just "Guard", but not by much.
Posted by: Farnsworth M Muldoon | May 11, 2018 at 11:50
London’s mayor, a man for whom intellectual consistency is much too difficult and therefore rarely attempted.
Posted by: David | May 11, 2018 at 12:51
That 'Misrepresenting Masculinity' piece is a keeper.
Posted by: PiperPaul | May 11, 2018 at 12:59
London’s mayor . . .
Khan laughs at your philosophical consistency and intellectual honesty. It's about power over the plebes. The way to make them compliant is to make it impossible to know which is the proper, "woke" path. Thus, they stop thinking entirely and do what the worthies tell them to do without question.
Posted by: R. Sherman | May 11, 2018 at 13:02
Via Reddit.
Posted by: David | May 11, 2018 at 13:05
I dream of my novel being given a pulp treatment. All the men must be given moustaches.
Posted by: Hector Drummond, Vile Novelist | May 11, 2018 at 14:05
“Negro/a” means “black” in Spanish. El vestido negro, the black dress; el perro negro, the black dog; una mesa negra, a black table.
Posted by: Pogonip | May 11, 2018 at 14:09
London’s mayor, a man for whom intellectual consistency is much too difficult and therefore rarely attempted.
Oh, there's a consistency there.
Posted by: Tim Newman | May 11, 2018 at 14:09
“Negro/a” means “black” in Spanish.
¡No! ¡Seguramente hace usted la broma!
Posted by: Farnsworth M Muldoon | May 11, 2018 at 14:30
She was aware the entire time that she would most likely be forbidden from riding:
My dear friend Ruha ― who has been a guest on my “Woman of Size” podcast about the discrimination against fat women’s bodies ― wrote: “Heads up. I was kicked off the Hogwarts ride because I didn’t fit. It was humiliating but they gave me front of the line passes to rest of the rides at Universal. Just be aware.”
Followed shortly by:
When I walked outside with my friends, I exclaimed, “Hogwarts would never condone this!” But upon further investigation, the books and movies have only a few big characters and most of them are antagonistic. The Fat Lady painting is obnoxious and bossy. The Dursleys are lazy and entitled. Crabbe and Goyle are both fat dunces who follow the orders of the lithe, vampire-looking Draco Malfoy. So I think I’m wrong! Hogwarts absolutely condones this and so does the general public. (emphasis mine)
So while complaining about the portrayal of fat people in the Potter world, she is literally a collage of some of the more obnoxious and odious characters in the series.
The very best part is her "bite me" photo, in which she poses with a churro and, presumably, a butter beer. So you are ejected from a ride for being too fat and respond by consuming sugar, fat, carbs, and more sugar.
She's going places, this one. But only places in which gravity will assist because, lets be honest, uphill isn't going to happen.
Posted by: SumDumGuy | May 11, 2018 at 14:41
She's going places, this one.
The safety issues which she mocks exist not only for her benefit but for those of the other riders, as well. Imagine being in the row behind her on the ride when centrifugal force begins to work its magic and she oozes her way out of her seat. To paraphrase Ben Shapiro, physics doesn't care about your feelings.
Posted by: R. Sherman | May 11, 2018 at 15:10
Here’s a thing.
Posted by: David | May 11, 2018 at 15:25
Here’s a thing.
Suppressor for a howitzer, training in Germany was often a PITA because of noise abatement rules, not to mention the short ranges (a M109 as in the photo has a max range of around 20 miles).
Posted by: Farnsworth M Muldoon | May 11, 2018 at 16:10
because of noise abatement rules
See, now you’re just taking all the fun out of it. :-)
Posted by: David | May 11, 2018 at 16:12
“You gotta feel sorry for the people who bought some of those books, especially the ones who bought the books by Joyce and Sartre.”
No refunds. Credit note only.
Posted by: Sam Duncan | May 11, 2018 at 16:32
...now you’re just taking all the fun out of it...
So did the German rules...
Posted by: Farnsworth M Muldoon | May 11, 2018 at 17:24
You know, I have no idea where to begin with this exercise in studied disregard.
Posted by: Darleen | May 11, 2018 at 19:05
I have no idea where to begin with this exercise in studied disregard.
So Kanye West is now “alt-right”? It’s so hard to keep up.
Posted by: David | May 11, 2018 at 19:16
From the toxic masculinity piece: "But some boys become savages and that's from training. I don't think that's necessarily innate."
The author has obviously never seen a room full of unsupervised toddlers. Savagery is the natural state of things. Much like poverty, it's what you get when nobody makes an effort. Every time somebody talks about men being pigs or savages or what have you, I'm always quick to agree with them:
(The trick is always to lead with "You're right." It catches them off-guard and gets them interested in what you're saying.)Posted by: Governor Squid | May 11, 2018 at 19:40
Modern art display.
Posted by: Hal | May 11, 2018 at 20:04
US Colleges accelerate their downward path...
https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=10880
Posted by: champ | May 11, 2018 at 20:42
They let fat women into the balloon basket here in Albuquerque back in 2005.
That is how the once proud Canadian Club Mounty on His proud Black Steed landed in front of my car on the interstate freeway and burned every so slowly.
Sometimes they hit the high power lines. Some land in the Rio Grande.
Occasionly they will drift over the Air Force Base, and fighter jets and Osprey Helios are involved. Almost everything but the balloons seems to have working steering and brakes.
Like being invaded by drunken retards. I have pictures but they say drinking at this altitude can be photogenic.
Posted by: neal | May 11, 2018 at 20:53
Darn, the fringe benefits for this job just got cut...
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/new-law-kansas-cops-cant-have-sex-during-traffic-stops/ar-AAx85cA?li=BBnbcA1&ocid=U452DHP
Posted by: champ | May 11, 2018 at 21:06
Like being invaded by drunken retards.
Grew up in the part of NJ where they have that huge annual ballon festival. SOP was that if one landed (i.e. crashed slowly, as that is what passes for landing in a balloon) on your property, the crew gave you a bottle of wine.
So did the German rules...
My question would be: If the Kraut artillerymen are used to training with suppressors, what happens when they need to use their guns for real? I mean, there is a significant difference between merely "holy shit!" loud and "Motörhead playing live five feet away" loud combined with a potentially life-altering concussive wave.
Posted by: Squires | May 11, 2018 at 21:55
...drunken retards.
Speaking of which, it never ceases to amaze me how the virtue signalling SJW celebrities fail to see their utter hypocrisy, and thus I give you:
Later clear across the continent...
Important things are important, I guess, and the right press on nails will save the baby seals, or something.
Posted by: Farnsworth M Muldoon | May 11, 2018 at 22:52
Just a point of terminology.
"Modern" art isn't what is being produced today. I like quite a lot of Modern art -- Picasso, Klimt, Vassarely etc. Modern art is the early moves away from strict realism, but still within bounds of sense and style.
"Contemporary" art, which is what is produced now, is largely a pile of steaming poo.
This is one of the few frictions in my marriage. I am extremely reluctant to go to any Contemporary art, and when my wife tricks me into it I'm quite grumpy about it. She thinks this is borderline Philistinism, to refuse to believe any Contemporary art is good. (I think some is good, I merely refuse to be dragged through all the dross to find it.)
And don't get me started on "post-contemporary"!
Posted by: Chester Draws | May 12, 2018 at 06:57
And don't get me started on "post-contemporary"!
I live by a code. In addition to things like, "No special orders in the drive-through," I have, "Anything with the word 'post' in the descriptor is going to suck, 'post-hole diggers' excepted."
Posted by: R. Sherman | May 12, 2018 at 07:23
Taxpayers of California, rejoice!
Posted by: David | May 12, 2018 at 08:33
Jordan Peterson is learning that for some "journalists", writing libelous screeds about him comes BEFORE the interview.
Posted by: Darleen | May 12, 2018 at 15:08
Taxpayers of California, rejoice!
... excuse the expression but Holy Shit ...
Posted by: Darleen | May 12, 2018 at 15:09
"Contemporary" art, which is what is produced now, is largely a pile of steaming poo.
I have an occasional hobby of sightseeing open houses in the area and relatively recently found a total and utter dud. My commentary afterwards:
At a later round of eyeballing houses I gave that description to a realtor I was chatting with. The gist of her utterly disgusted reaction was Oh, Contemporary.
---Oh, and yes, I met the "designer" during that tour. Yes, he is a hipster.
Posted by: Hal | May 12, 2018 at 18:03
Taxpayers of California, rejoice!
Absolutely.
The taxpayers of California can rejoice because we do not appear to be paying for those two instances of, as it were, completely shit writing, instead of actual reporting.
With Dailywire and nbcbayarea being what is cited there, if they wanted to achieve any credibility with anyone, they would also discuss the actual topic. They don't and that pair of articles leaves 'em revealed as idiots . . . contemporary even . . !
That very specifically outlined area is The Tenderloin, where the wannabe reporters add an extra street on the north side to include Union Square, with the corner of Market and Van Ness added to the south so that City Hall can be included.
Reading through both "articles", there isn't even one single mention of "Tenderloin" given that what they are very clearly focused on is only The Tenderloin. Instead, the recurring and quite fraudulent attempt is to claim that the sole single very well known problem neighborhood is the entirety of "downtown" San Francisco.
The actual downtown SF area is basically, oh, Broadway, Van Ness, Market, and The Embarcadero. Included in that area is the Financial District, Chinatown, Nob Hill, Union Square, Civic Center and City Hall, and also The Tenderloin. As a further underline of the failure of these "reporters", compare that map of The Tenderloin with the entirety of San Francisco.
Oh, yes, and Dailywire is attempting to get mileage with a headline of San Francisco Spends $30 Million Cleaning Feces, Drug Needles. Somehow they forgot to add that the San Francisco city budget is in the range of eight to ten billion dollars . . . and that's with a rounding approximation of two billion dollars . . .
Posted by: Hal | May 12, 2018 at 19:21
Graduation advice . . .
Posted by: Hal | May 12, 2018 at 21:47
Oy bloody veh. Apparently the comic strip isn't the joke.
Posted by: Hal | May 12, 2018 at 21:54
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/11101639/WW1-machine-gun-found-in-mans-garage.html
Good to know the British police have rounded up all the real criminals.
Posted by: jabrwok | May 14, 2018 at 19:48
The prophecies, they are coming true!
https://mobile.twitter.com/Hippopeteamus/status/996003168172429312
Posted by: TimT | May 15, 2018 at 05:58
seems relevant now more than ever.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p2N-sf7NgrA
Posted by: Ed | May 15, 2018 at 23:46