London wildlife. (h/t, Holborn) || Interspecies communication. || It’s a chemical art. (h/t, Matthew) || “As languages develop, they create colour names in a certain order.” || Packaging of note. (h/t, Obo) || Debra Soh on transsexuality, fetishes and gaydar. || Nocturnal time lapse. || Heh. (h/t, Julia) || Her bad day was way worse than yours. || The big bitchin’ choons of the ancient world. (h/t, Pogonip) || For working dogs. || In Missouri, sideboob and underboob are banned in public. || Tapping tape. || “The size of Dan’s scrotum affects every aspect of his daily life.” || Holedown is a game. || She’s a druid, obviously, and a feminine chaos dragon. || And finally, I think you’ve got a little something on your face.
Hello David,
As a long time fan, well since 2013 when I discovered your very seedy dive, I would like to pay a little off from my bar tab. But Firstly, I've asked you before as you long ago mentioned a book, and I am becoming sorely tried in the waiting.
Where is it? You know you have it in you.
You have a marvelous way about you, and you have a great set of regulars and occasionals, and as you often correctly say, the ATL's are really only the springboards for what's to follow.
Now, I'm going to tickle your big fat glistening belly, and throw a few jinglers into your moth-eaten bowler hat. Also give me more Laurie Penny, I like Laurie, she is a ludicrous fool, but I wouldn't mind getting on her case...
*Tickles David's Big Fat Glistening Belly, and hopes for more of my Lovely Laurie...Sigh...*
Posted by: Cathal | August 10, 2018 at 01:36
It's magic!!!
Posted by: R. Sherman | August 10, 2018 at 02:00
She’s a druid, obviously, and a feminine chaos dragon.
That's an impressive Hapsburg chin on that gentleman.
Posted by: Daniel Ream | August 10, 2018 at 03:09
She’s a druid, obviously, and a feminine chaos dragon.
My first thought was Austin Powers' "That's a man, baby!"
Posted by: ComputerLabRat | August 10, 2018 at 04:48
Now, I'm going to tickle your big fat glistening belly...
Oh, gawd. You're gonna make him post that creepy Jeff Goldblum gif.
[drinks up]
[picks up hat]
[exits]
Posted by: Spiny Norman | August 10, 2018 at 05:19
Snowflake running for Congress.
Posted by: Darleen | August 10, 2018 at 06:26
Morning, all.
As a long time fan, well since 2013 when I discovered your very seedy dive, I would like to pay a little off from my bar tab.
See, that’s a sentiment I can get behind, and much appreciated.
You know you have it in you.
It isn’t so much the writing of one that’s an issue, but the selling of one. As a use of time and effort, writing a book – almost any kind of book, and certainly the kind I’d write – isn’t exactly lucrative. Such things rarely sell in numbers that make sense and are generally done at a loss as part of an attempt to build a wider media career, which is not an enticing prospect. Besides, anything that would be in one is probably already here, albeit in bits.
Also give me more Laurie Penny
I’m sure she’ll make an appearance before too long. Being, as she is, so reliably wrong.
Oh, gawd. You're gonna make him post that creepy Jeff Goldblum gif.
This one?
What?
Posted by: David | August 10, 2018 at 06:46
I suspect any book would require careful libel checking before a decent publisher would touch it. Writing a book to give money to a lawyer seems a bad proposition to me.
(Books get taken for libel actions in ways blogs don't because publishers have real money. )
Posted by: Chester Draws | August 10, 2018 at 08:27
Writing a book to give money to a lawyer seems a bad proposition to me.
Yes, that’s pretty much what would happen. When the clear implication is that certain statusful academics and media figures are dishonest, hypocritical or hilariously incompetent, it’s a publishing minefield, even when you can prove each point with the subject’s own words and actions. For the kinds of small publishers that might find such content appealing, it’s simply not worth the expense, when challenged, of proving each unflattering statement.
Posted by: David | August 10, 2018 at 08:39
The tolerant left, part 4,091.
He’s an educator, you know.
Posted by: David | August 10, 2018 at 08:43
Re London wildlife, I've been away for a while now, is it normal for pedestrians on Leytonstone High Street to go barefoot?
Posted by: Ray | August 10, 2018 at 09:49
It isn’t so much the writing of one that’s an issue, but the selling of one. As a use of time and effort, writing a book – almost any kind of book, and certainly the kind I’d write – isn’t exactly lucrative.
Nonsense! My recent campus satire The Biscuit Factory is bringing in hundreds of pennies, and I'm now planning a slap-up trip to a Harvester to celebrate. Might even be able to afford to take my wife as well.
Posted by: Hector Drummond, Vile Novelist | August 10, 2018 at 09:50
Might even be able to afford to take my wife as well.
Let’s not go crazy.
Posted by: David | August 10, 2018 at 10:35
“The size of Dan’s scrotum affects every aspect of his daily life.”
Nope. Not a chance. (sweat breaks out on brow while struggling to fight the overwhelming urge to CLICK THE LINK!)
Posted by: Tom | August 10, 2018 at 10:55
(sweat breaks out on brow while struggling to fight the overwhelming urge to CLICK THE LINK!)
Embrace the fear.
Posted by: David | August 10, 2018 at 11:02
Sandifer has been a notoriously unpleasant cunt in that unholy crossover between doctor who fandom and sjw-dom for many years so it's no surprise to see he's now claiming to be a woman
Posted by: Jugra | August 10, 2018 at 11:05
Our educated betters:
Via Ben Sixsmith.
Posted by: David | August 10, 2018 at 11:27
Our educated betters:
Always a blue tick.
Posted by: sH2 | August 10, 2018 at 11:34
Always a blue tick.
I suppose it’s possible, in theory, that one might almost feel pity for them - the endless contortion and neurotic posturing must take a toll. It all seems rather soul-withering. But not being a saint, I can’t get past the fact that they’re so nauseating and socially corrosive.
Posted by: David | August 10, 2018 at 12:30
https://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2018/08/09/drunk-irritable-wasps-britain/
Posted by: Pogonip | August 10, 2018 at 13:35
"Homeless people wearing barcodes to accept cashless payments"
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/08/08/homeless-people-wearing-barcodes-new-project-increase-donations/
Posted by: svh | August 10, 2018 at 13:47
“The size of Dan’s scrotum affects every aspect of his daily life.”
Bright lights and cold steel. There are people out there called "urologists" who can fix this, but then one actually has to want to be cured.
Debra Soh on transsexuality...An abbreviated response to the transgender business.
In Skullbone, a woman may not “pleasure a man” who is operating a motor vehicle.
Be safe, if you drive, wear a condom, and if you have sex, use your seatbelt, remember, coming and going don't mix.
Posted by: Farnsworth M Muldoon | August 10, 2018 at 13:57
Heh.
Maintaining Teh Narrative™.
This is nifty - Wind powered animals. More here where you can buy kits for mini-versions.
Posted by: Farnsworth M Muldoon | August 10, 2018 at 14:15
I denounce myself.
Posted by: David | August 10, 2018 at 14:16
An abbreviated response to the transgender business.
While I agree with much of what she is saying, I don't find her argument sufficiently convincing. She's glossing over the hermaphrodite and chimera factors. Not that those factors are close to explaining 100% of the transgender issue, and I agree that much of it is a form/manifestation of some sort of mental illness, but I don't think she's doing justice to her main point in framing her argument in that simplistic manner. As DNA testing becomes more widely used, we may find that a lot more of these cases have slipped under the radar. She also seems a bit too dismissive of the genetic factors, especially in regard to common genetic mutations, in human behavior/sexuality.
Posted by: WTP | August 10, 2018 at 14:29
...I don't find her argument sufficiently convincing. She's glossing over the hermaphrodite and chimera factors.
That is but a two minute snip of this longer video interview in which these are mentioned, bearing in mind "intersex" is the PC term du jour for actual biological variants caused by errors in transcription which cause these variations.
Posted by: Farnsworth M Muldoon | August 10, 2018 at 14:40
“Wind powered animals.”
Former Mythbuster Adam Savage builds a Japanese knockoff, his own (pedal-powered) knockoff, and meets the real thing.
Posted by: Sam Duncan | August 10, 2018 at 15:40
Hipsters on parade.
Posted by: Hal | August 10, 2018 at 15:44
(Books get taken for libel actions in ways blogs don't because publishers have real money. )
An issue with blogs.
Posted by: Hal | August 10, 2018 at 15:56
Friends don’t let friends piss away money on “Whiteness Studies.”
Posted by: David | August 10, 2018 at 16:09
Friends don’t let friends piss away money on “Whiteness Studies.”
Slight correction for accuracy.
Posted by: Farnsworth M Muldoon | August 10, 2018 at 16:56
This is good (despite being in The Atlantic)...
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/08/why-the-left-is-so-afraid-of-jordan-peterson/567110/
Posted by: dw | August 10, 2018 at 17:02
This is good (despite being in The Atlantic)...
That, as they say. I scarcely need to point out that woke posturing is horribly narrowing and its conclusions are usually predestined - well in advance of any mental activity that might accidentally occur. It practically strangles thought. Which I suppose is why some people like it.
Posted by: David | August 10, 2018 at 17:34
In Missouri, sideboob and underboob are banned in public.
The linked post, titled "The Most Absurd Sex Laws in the US", includes:
Spouses can sue if their partner gets an abortion without their consent.
alongside such things as requiring a no-kissing notice on reptile sales and the like. Sorry but...isn't allowing civil action against a married women who surprises her husband with an abortion imminently reasonable? I'm sure the linked website thinks that alimony is equally absurd, right? Right?
Sorry to piss on the Ephemera Parade with abortion AND men's rights virtue signalling, but a tiger can't change his stripes, ya know?
Posted by: Sam | August 10, 2018 at 18:10
This belatedly occurred to me. The Norfolk, VA police dept got most of the attention...
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5ywAz5ba9Qs
Posted by: Pogonip | August 10, 2018 at 18:12
To go while coming was a "thing" in the late 1970s. Nelson Rockefeller made it.
Posted by: Adam | August 10, 2018 at 18:17
"...it's like carrying a ball and chain..."
More ball than chain, a lot more.
Posted by: Adam | August 10, 2018 at 18:25
As long as the package graphics do not inadvertently write "Allah", I'm good with it.
Posted by: Adam | August 10, 2018 at 18:31
Me: I'm not a Nazi! Will you please listen? I am not a Nazi, do you understand? Honestly!
SJW: Only a true Nazi doesn't like my amazing haircut.
Me: What? Well, what sort of chance does that give me? All right! I am a Nazi!
Leftists: He is! He is a Nazi!
Me: Now, FUCK OFF!
Found here:
https://twitter.com/ElSandifer/status/1027636345546661896
Posted by: Monty James | August 10, 2018 at 19:08
You know, I'm surprised that more people when faced with the riposte "but white people can't be racist because racism = prejudice + power yada yada yada" don't simply respond with: "OK, but being an asshole to someone simply because of their skin color is wrong."
I know the severely educated would try valiantly to justify the behavior, but it's one of those things that most (think 90%+) of people understand fundamentally, and therefore any bullshitting around it would be seen as such.
Posted by: Sam | August 10, 2018 at 19:22
If anyone has trouble with comments not appearing, email me and I’ll rattle the spam filter.
Posted by: David | August 10, 2018 at 19:41
real genuine frontier SJW gibberish in a timely manner.
As was pointed out farther down, the tweeted line was hardly gibberish. The author’s well groomed lack of self awareness, unfortunately, merely prevented them from aiming it at the more fitting target.
Posted by: Squires | August 10, 2018 at 19:44
Thanks for the rattling, David.
Posted by: Monty James | August 10, 2018 at 19:48
Ok, trust me on this. In the process of assisting my spouse find some audio visuals for a history class she teaches, I opened a new tab on the computer and located this: this. So, while it was playing in the background, I scrolled up through the comments and noticed that the video sort of synced with the Goldblum gif.
Bottom line: That's enough internet for today.
Posted by: R. Sherman | August 10, 2018 at 20:02
SJW: Only a true Nazi doesn't like my amazing haircut.
I was unaware that male pattern baldness was a haircut, but then, I guess if he thinks he is a woman, he probably thinks that purple mess is a Farah Fawcett mane.
Posted by: Farnsworth M Muldoon | August 10, 2018 at 20:18
That guy with the purple lipstick needs lessons on how to apply same. Lipstick, I mean. The lesson on how to apply bright purple lipstick is “Don’t, except on Halloween.”
Posted by: Pogonip | August 10, 2018 at 20:52
If anyone has trouble with comments not appearing, email me and I’ll rattle the spam filter.
I'm having trouble with that last picture appearing...because it's appearing. Yikes. How many credit notes do I need in order to purchase a pickled "egg"?
Posted by: WTP | August 10, 2018 at 21:46
How many credit notes do I need in order to purchase a pickled “egg”?
You’re in luck. There’s one left in the ashtray, barely touched.
It’s on the house.
Posted by: David | August 10, 2018 at 21:57
The good doctor seems to have Zhits nose punched sometime in the past.
I am sure that is nothing a little makeup will fix up in a jiffy.
Of course, men can be ugly women too. Only haters would object.
Posted by: neal | August 10, 2018 at 22:07
From Ace and apparently the only sane sociologist in California, how to tell rayciss microaggressions from woke SJW talk.
Posted by: Farnsworth M Muldoon | August 11, 2018 at 00:57
David, you can’t give away THAT pickled “egg”! We’re throwing it a Sweet Sixteen party tomorrow for its birthday!
Posted by: Pogonip | August 11, 2018 at 00:58
I'm starting to think looking into the Hungarian real estate market might not be a bad idea...
Posted by: Farnsworth M Muldoon | August 11, 2018 at 03:21
Craziness in Seattle... I mean major league crazy
Posted by: Darleen | August 11, 2018 at 05:19
how to tell rayciss microaggressions from woke SJW talk.
As the thread there makes clear, the intellectual inconsistency is quite spectacular.
And again, as they brag, these are educated people.
And so the question arises – have these expensively educated journalists, for Vox, Slate and Salon, spent their time and money learning how to lie opportunistically, with a bare-faced disregard for any kind of standards, or just learning how not to think clearly, in case it undermines the “social justice” ideology in which they’ve invested?
Posted by: David | August 11, 2018 at 08:38
And not entirely unrelated.
Note the preening tone, by now so familiar, of Dr Marsha Henry, our “feminist, academic.”
Also note Dr Henry’s repeated and unironic retweeting of Crystal Fleming, another woke academic, Harvard educated, and whose departures from reality have entertained us more than once.
Via Julia.
Posted by: David | August 11, 2018 at 09:49
Puzzling cabinet of note:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWYexjYqinU
Posted by: Captain Nemo | August 11, 2018 at 10:40
...or just learning how not to think clearly, in case it undermines the “social justice” ideology in which they’ve invested?
Seeing as how all they do is spout the same boilerplate, I believe the issue is learning how not to think period, or, as Patton put it, "If everyone is thinking alike, then no one is thinking."
Speaking of regurgitating boilerplate and not thinking, SJW ideology 0: Real World 2.
Posted by: Farnsworth M Muldoon | August 11, 2018 at 12:33
Racist breakfast.
A) I am a bit confused how one "hides" a toothpick with Union Jack on it. I suspect Aoneilly may be a few beans short of a full breakfast.
B) I am likewise confused why someone knowingly ordering a full English breakfast, in London, would find a UK flag in said breakfast "racist".
C) I remain confused about the whole concept of why people actually eat a full English breakfast, but that is a separate issue...
Posted by: Farnsworth M Muldoon | August 11, 2018 at 13:08
I remain confused about the whole concept of why people actually eat a full English breakfast...
[ Starts handing out pitchforks and burning torches. ]
Posted by: David | August 11, 2018 at 13:51
the intellectual inconsistency is quite spectacular.
They're consistently anti-white. They're upfront and proud of their anti-whiteness, which is a founding principle of their intellectual system, not an anomaly.
If you replaced "white" with "Jews"/"blacks"/etc it would be regarded as "racist", but that's just restating the axioms of the anti-white activists, it's not catching them out being untrue to equalist principles (that they don't claim to have), or going overboard with rhetoric (they mean what they say).
Euphemia Ephemera.
Posted by: Natalino Otto | August 11, 2018 at 15:59
"Campus Reform's Cabot Phillips traveled to Columbia University, an Ivy League school, and offered $20 to any person who could name all five freedoms guaranteed by the First Amendment. Not one student was able to list the five freedoms, which are freedom of speech, religion, assembly, press, and petition. While Phillips reported that many students were able to name one or two of the freedoms, many were seen on camera struggling to name even one."
https://www.dailywire.com/news/34179/watch-millennials-try-explain-first-amendment-ryan-saavedra
As our host would say, "Our betters".
Posted by: Jacob | August 11, 2018 at 15:59
They’re consistently anti-white.
It does seem to be the only imperative. All roads must end there.
Posted by: David | August 11, 2018 at 16:06
[ Starts handing out pitchforks and burning torches. ]
[Slides plate of biscuits and gravy, sausage, and hash browns down the bar to convert the savages]
Posted by: Farnsworth M Muldoon | August 11, 2018 at 16:23
From Farnsworth's link, we find this quote, which exemplifies the mindset of the "elite" who graduate from college with degrees in the (modern) humanities and presume to lecture the rest of us:
Evil is a make-believe concept we've invented to deal with the complexities of fellow humans holding values and beliefs and perspectives different than our own.
How one can be exposed to recorded human history and or, the daily news feed on one's iPhone and reach that conclusion is beyond my comprehension. And, BTW, I sincerely doubt the author of that statement would apply it to his dealings with POTUS or the "deplorables" who support him.
Posted by: R. Sherman | August 11, 2018 at 16:27
Darleen: "Craziness in Seattle... I mean major league crazy"
Ir's unthinkable that this could happen after 9/11. How does a mechanic get to steal a plane & not get shot down before he's retracted the undercarriage?
Posted by: JuliaM | August 11, 2018 at 16:47
[Slides plate of biscuits and gravy, sausage, and hash browns down the bar to convert the savages]
See, the problem is, for a Brit, the word biscuits calls to mind images of Digestives, Hobnobs, or perhaps a Custard Cream. Things you might dunk in tea.
Posted by: David | August 11, 2018 at 17:10
Are those BAKED BEANS in that cup?
I recognize the egg and the link sausages. The triangular things look like deep-fried toast points? And what’s the rest of that stuff?
Posted by: Pogonip | August 11, 2018 at 17:27
Ir's unthinkable that this could happen after 9/11. How does a mechanic get to steal a plane & not get shot down before he's retracted the undercarriage?
What?
Posted by: Ten | August 11, 2018 at 17:28
See, the problem is, for a Brit, the word biscuits calls to mind images of Digestives...
No, no, those are cookies or crackers, and I am not talking about the things you pull at Christmas.
Posted by: Farnsworth M Muldoon | August 11, 2018 at 17:50
“I am likewise confused why someone knowingly ordering a full English breakfast, in London, would find a UK flag in said breakfast "racist".”
I'm confused as to why the Union Jack is racist today when it was all “Cool Britannia” back at the turn of the century. And in the 1960s. I certainly remember it being racist when I was at school, right enough. It's really hard to figure out any pattern here.
Posted by: Sam Duncan | August 11, 2018 at 17:58
I challenge you to watch the whole thing. Fortunately they fast forward through some of the boring parts.
https://youtu.be/VWKt4AOM5Yw
Posted by: WTP | August 11, 2018 at 18:21
Crunchy things you dunk are cookies. Tooth-breaking hard things you dunk are biscotti (Italian for “cookie,” if I remember right). Biscuits are little round quick breads you bake; you either mix up a batter yourself, in which case they are homemade biscuits, or get them out of a can with a spiraling seam in it, in which case they are whomp biscuits, because after the little tear-strip that is supposed to open the can tears off in your hand, you have to whomp the can on the edge of the counter to break it open.
There will be a quiz later.
Whomp biscuits can also usually be opened by pressing a spoon into the seam on the can. But please don’t call whomp biscuits spoon biscuits, because there is a souffle-like concoction called spoon bread, and we don’t want to make this any more confusing than it already is.
Posted by: Pogonip | August 11, 2018 at 19:26
After the pickled “eggs” have sat in the ashtray for a few years, they become whomp eggs.
Posted by: Pogonip | August 11, 2018 at 20:05
“We read Orwell as a warning; they read Orwell as a textbook."
Posted by: Darleen | August 11, 2018 at 21:06
“We read Orwell as a warning; they read Orwell as a textbook.”
Paywalled, sadly.
Posted by: David | August 11, 2018 at 21:08
Paywalled? That's weird. Hmmmmm... Maybe if you follow through the link on Jordan Peterson's tweet
Posted by: Darleen | August 11, 2018 at 21:16
Paywalled, sadly.
David, you can get to it here. Hit the link in the top tweet in the caption under the screencap.
The basics:
Much more at the link.
Posted by: Farnsworth M Muldoon | August 11, 2018 at 21:30
Maybe if you follow through the link on Jordan Peterson’s tweet
Ah, thanks. “I think we should be really, really clear about this…”
Posted by: David | August 11, 2018 at 21:35
Farnsworth
I watched the indignant Jacinta Allan sputter and gulp at being challenged to state one objectionable thing broadcast in the stations after it was pointed out to her that the Cottrell interview did not air in the stations. Absof**kingamazing.
Posted by: Darleen | August 11, 2018 at 21:38
Not being an Ozzie and thus not familiar with Sky New, I presume they are like Fox News? While I’m sure these government weasles would be quite fine with leftist friendly news programs at those stations, I do see the point in general. Personally one of the things I find most annoying about flying in the US the last 15-20 years or so is the ubiquitous nature of CNN in damn near every airport on screens right by the gate where you are generally stuck for 30 minutes or so in the boarding process. I’ll never forget changing planes at George Bush Airport and having to listen to CNN talking heads blather on and on about what a fascist George Bush is. I could do without that myself. Assuming it was applied equally. Which I’m sure it wouldn’t be.
Posted by: WTP | August 11, 2018 at 21:57
Absof**kingamazing.
Indeed, such a "long list" she couldn't name one. I am still recovering from "They Day", however, and the fact of its attendant "enforcement officer".
Posted by: Farnsworth M Muldoon | August 11, 2018 at 21:57
More fresh hell from the clown quarter."Male, pale and stale university professors to be given 'reverse mentors'"
I see. An old white, male, expert, will be assigned a young, ethnic, female, non-expert "mentor". Yeah, I can see nothing possibly going wrong with this.
Posted by: Farnsworth M Muldoon | August 11, 2018 at 23:10
...[T]he scheme will allow eminent professors to confront their own biases and leave them “feeling quite uncomfortable”.
In Humphrey Cobb's novel Paths of Glory, a young lieutenant is ordered to submit the names of men in his platoon who will be tried for cowardice, regardless of their actual behavior on the battlefield. Instead of complying, he writes to the general that he's pleased to report that none of his soldiers are cowards. He then goes riding and is unavailable to further comply with the order.
I would suggest that such eminent professors take the same approach. Tell the dean, "I'm pleased to report, I have no biases," at which point, they take a vacation.
Posted by: R. Sherman | August 11, 2018 at 23:18
Tell the dean, "I'm pleased to report, I have no biases," at which point, they take a vacation.
Reporting you have no biases is just proof that you have so much bias you can't see your biases.
That is some catch, that Catch-22.
Posted by: Farnsworth M Muldoon | August 12, 2018 at 00:37
“reverse mentors”
Unintentionally apt nomenclature there.
Posted by: Sam Duncan | August 12, 2018 at 01:43
Male, pale and stale university professors to be given ‘reverse mentors’
I think that one deserves a short post of its own.
Posted by: David | August 12, 2018 at 09:17
Punctuation mark of note:
https://twitter.com/ImACultHero/status/1027997956438478848
Posted by: Captain Nemo | August 12, 2018 at 12:07
Punctuation mark of note
Heh. Open for business, as one wag quipped.
Posted by: David | August 12, 2018 at 12:09
Presumably the restaurant in question is accessed by the rear entrance. What?
Posted by: Captain Nemo | August 12, 2018 at 12:23
Ir's unthinkable that this could happen after 9/11. How does a mechanic get to steal a plane & not get shot down before he's retracted the undercarriage?
It's our TSA heroes in action.
Posted by: Ted S., Catskill Mtns., NY, USA | August 12, 2018 at 12:49
It's our TSA heroes in action.
Much as I loathe those clowns, in this instance the guy was a baggage handler/ground ops so he had full access to the ramp area and therefore the planes, this one can't be blamed on their general fecklessness.
Posted by: Farnsworth M Muldoon | August 12, 2018 at 13:23
Hopefully this guy wore a cup. Don’t see any references to him ever having children, so perhaps not?
https://youtu.be/_Jflun5CyIc
Posted by: WTP | August 12, 2018 at 17:22
It practically strangles thought. Which I suppose is why some people like it.
=====
IncSoc smiles.
Posted by: fnord | August 12, 2018 at 22:40
It practically strangles thought. Which I suppose is why some people like it.
====
IngSoc smiles.
Posted by: fnord | August 12, 2018 at 22:42
there is a souffle-like concoction called spoon bread
Ambrosia.
Posted by: Pst314 | August 13, 2018 at 01:10
Lions and tigers and bears... oh my
https://twitter.com/SirBasilBrush/status/1028590825025032192
Posted by: ftumch | August 13, 2018 at 10:50