Friday Ephemera
September 06, 2019
The clock is ticking, someone save the cat. || Close enough. || Close enough 2. || Breakfast cereal amplifier. || On second thoughts, perhaps not. || I question the parenting. || Toilet-related submarine mishap of note. || Burger-chain kitchen scenes. || His chocolate-cake lollipops are fancier than yours. (h/t, Elephants Gerald) || It also makes spherical ice. || The Megatherium Club. || Smarten up, your date’s here. || Tough day. || Tim Newman on standards and woke condescension. || Every Noise At Once. || Build your own wooden hurdy-gurdy. || Build your own functional paper organ. || And finally, when you mislabel baldness medication as an acid reflux treatment and inadvertently produce really hairy children.
The clock is ticking, someone save the cat
Cat rescue of note: https://twitter.com/seankent/status/1168963253319426049
Via DamCou.
Posted by: Captain Nemo | September 06, 2019 at 00:40
The picture of this little girl before and after school has me howling.
It's hysterical how concrete institutions so nicely socialize small, impressionable humans.
Posted by: Ten | September 06, 2019 at 01:21
The clock is ticking, someone save the cat.
Save The Cat!
Posted by: Hal | September 06, 2019 at 01:25
Close enough 2
Close enough 3.
Posted by: Hal | September 06, 2019 at 01:32
Close enough 3.
I didn't watch until the end. Did Buster catch the wheel of double gloucester to win the Cooper's Hill Cheese-Rolling and Wake?
Posted by: Steve E | September 06, 2019 at 02:16
His chocolate-cake lollipops are fancier than yours.
I don't like setting aside egg yolks like that. I get antsy when that happens in cooking - egg yolks deteriorate quickly.
Posted by: TimT | September 06, 2019 at 03:49
I can't come close to our host's witty commentary, so I'll just post it and let you be marveled.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/art-gallery-visitors-must-squeeze-19435116
Posted by: Steve across the Pond | September 06, 2019 at 06:19
really hairy children.
Band name.
Posted by: [+] | September 06, 2019 at 06:25
Re hairy children
who the hell is giving acid reflux meds to their SIX MONTH OLD in the first place??!!
Posted by: Darleen | September 06, 2019 at 06:49
Morning, all.
That’s a lot of Snickers and cheese.
Not an unfair point.
Posted by: David | September 06, 2019 at 06:58
If anyone has trouble with comments not appearing, email me and I’ll take a broom handle to the spam filter.
Posted by: David | September 06, 2019 at 07:02
The clock is ticking, someone save the cat.
That was close. :-)
Posted by: Liz | September 06, 2019 at 08:12
Some of the most wholesome music videos I've ever seen.
(Qt Georgian girls don't hurt either.)
Posted by: Jonathan | September 06, 2019 at 09:00
Infinity War, Part 3: Enter Sherlock Holmes
Posted by: Hal | September 06, 2019 at 09:02
Not an unfair point.
I can't even get files off an old laptop.
Posted by: svh | September 06, 2019 at 09:25
I can’t even get files off an old laptop.
I suppose it’s one of those things that exists not for social or technological realism but for ease of storytelling. I’ve been catching up on The Expanse - which starts off a bit meh but quickly gets quite interesting - and everyone’s manically wafting files from one device to another with a remarkable reliability. Society on several planets may be falling apart and the apocalypse may loom, but at least the Bluetooth works flawlessly.
Posted by: David | September 06, 2019 at 09:42
I can't even get files off an old laptop.
And Phil Collins continues to randomly play on the audio system of my truck. But to be fair, and somewhat puzzling as well, it never plays anyone that I find exceptionally annoying. While I have found a possible solution, it's worse, and fraught with potentially more misery, than the mildly amusing problem itself. Seems like Arthur C. Clarke coulda/woulda/shoulda covered this.
Posted by: WTP | September 06, 2019 at 10:59
I question the parenting.
Oh, come on, now. Who among us hasn't done that ?
art-gallery-visitors-must-squeeze
Bold and empowering, but don't objectify me, or something. Alas, I missed this visionary work, which probably explains all after.
I blame the toenails.
who the hell is giving acid reflux meds to their SIX MONTH OLD in the first place??!!
Though of very low incidence, kids can get ulcers at any age, most commonly because of H. pylori infection, but also because of taking an NSAID like ibuprofen, sometimes a congenital hiatal hernia. Kids of any age can also have problems with reflux (infants initially have lousy esophageal sphincters which is why they spit up stuff if overfed) which can be an overlooked cause of respiratory problems and may actually be part of the cause of asthma in some.
A musical interlude for Dr Gagliano of the other day.
Posted by: Farnsworth M Muldoon | September 06, 2019 at 11:56
It is OK when we do it, but you wypipo, not so much.
Meanwhile, someone doesn't quite understand reproductive biology.
Posted by: Farnsworth M Muldoon | September 06, 2019 at 12:11
I can't even get files off an old laptop.
I recall an article in Science many years ago, with a picture of a first-edition Shakespeare (don't remember which) next to a 11" single-sided floppy disk. The author's point was that the first-edition Shakespeare was still perfectly legible after umpty-hundred years, the 20-year-old 11" floppy disk was no longer of value to anybody but a museum because nothing could read it.
Posted by: Y. Knott | September 06, 2019 at 12:30
not an unfair point
From the link: "The most unrealistic element of every sci-fi movie is that all their technology is compatible with all their other technology."
Equally unrealistic: the technology works reliably, and the user interfaces are all very well designed.
Posted by: pst314 | September 06, 2019 at 12:43
Teen Vogue is still going full-on “social justice” and still giving youngsters really bad advice.
Posted by: David | September 06, 2019 at 14:04
Teen Vogue is still going full-on “social justice” and still giving youngsters really bad advice.
The three steps of leftist politics:
1. Advocate harmful ideas.
2. Harm results.
3. Double down on those same harmful ideas.
Posted by: pst314 | September 06, 2019 at 14:18
Tough day
Heh. That bag may hold the head of a classmate who had a tougher day.
Posted by: Burnsie | September 06, 2019 at 14:20
We hear a lot about people, in merrie old England and in the United States and in other places, who don't think you should have the right or the ability to defend yourself. But this one takes it to a whole new level:
https://twitter.com/shailjapatel/status/1168682215091273730
"When you tell women and girls to learn self-defense, or carry weapons against rapists, you're not reducing rape. You're just saying "let him rape someone more vulnerable.""
Best reply (in my opinion): "If you lock your house and install a security system, you're asking the burglar to rob a different house."
Posted by: Alex | September 06, 2019 at 14:59
Meanwhile, someone doesn't quite understand reproductive biology.
IOW, she has a kink ... which actually provides more evidence that trangenderism isn't just about dysphoria but about autogynephilia.
Posted by: Darleen | September 06, 2019 at 15:58
The three steps of leftist politics:
1. Advocate harmful ideas.
2. Harm results.
3. Double down on those same harmful ideas.
In case anyone missed it, Exhibit A.
[ Added: ]
An enormous chunk of the left seems hell-bent on eroding attitudes and behaviours that are assets for living – whether it’s monogamous coupling, managed migration, or emotional self-possession. And once lost, these attributes and habits are difficult to regain, perhaps irretrievable. Laurie Penny’s evasive, self-flattering prattle, linked above, is just a convenient shorthand for a wider trend. She has almost all of the signature tics of modern leftism.
And as noted before, Ms Penny’s own career trajectory would most likely have been impossible without the residual effects of the values and priorities that she claims to despise - and without a great many other people cultivating those same values and keeping things ticking over. A fact Laurie counts on, albeit quietly. In effect, we, the bourgeois rubes, are her safety net. The fact that few of us are credulous enough to take her at her words and follow her advice is what allows her to mouth it in relative comfort and security, knowing that the destruction of capitalism, heteronormativity or whatever (and all that goes with it), which she claims to want, won’t happen just yet.
Posted by: David | September 06, 2019 at 16:06
Mr. Mosley? Meet James Damore. Mr. Damore, meet Walter Mosley.
Posted by: Darleen | September 06, 2019 at 16:07
An enormous chunk of the left seems hell-bent on eroding attitudes and behaviours that are assets for living
Which supports my contention that the chief motive for leftism is hatred of our civilization (or any civilization.)
Posted by: pst314 | September 06, 2019 at 17:00
Which supports my contention that the chief motive for leftism is hatred of our civilization
Well, if you try to fathom leftism on its own professed terms, and in terms of its outcomes and likely outcomes, it very often seems incoherent and irrational, impervious to the lessons of reality, evasive, dishonest or simply perverse. But if you think of it in terms of psychology, not least vanity and spite, a lot of it becomes explicable, if not particularly attractive.
Posted by: David | September 06, 2019 at 17:21
Leftism is based in envy, which in turn is rooted in status anxiety, I think.
If you wanted more of it, you could dumb down education and ability whilst simultaneously encouraging an entitlement attitude. This would mean followers could only build themselves up and raise their status (in their own eyes, at least) by tearing others down.
Hey, wait...
Posted by: Hopp Singg | September 06, 2019 at 17:29
But if you think of it in terms of psychology, not least vanity and spite, a lot of it becomes explicable
Indeed. Must never forget vanity as a motive--both the vanity of virtue-signalling and the vanity of intellectuals demonstrating their superior cleverness by concocting elaborate theories to justify embracing foolish and evil ideas.
Posted by: pst314 | September 06, 2019 at 17:37
demonstrating their superior cleverness by concocting elaborate theories to justify embracing foolish and evil ideas
For instance.
Posted by: David | September 06, 2019 at 17:41
From: For instance.
When you imagine yourself as part of the ruling elite, everyone else must be on the lowest level possible.
Posted by: Steve E | September 06, 2019 at 18:36
Leftism has the tells and symptoms of clinical disorder but structurally it manifests as simple force. You shall do as we say or you will suffer the consequences.
When in the minority they're abrasive in the extreme. When in the majority they just steamroll things.
But this is not intolerance. Or lacking compassion. Just ask them.
Posted by: Ten | September 06, 2019 at 18:42
When you imagine yourself as part of the ruling elite, everyone else must be on the lowest level possible.
The arrogance throughout, the colossal presumption, is quite extraordinary. And then of course there’s this bit:
As feats of moral contortion go, it’s quite a thing.
Somewhat related, this and this.
There is, it seems, a pattern.
Posted by: David | September 06, 2019 at 19:22
I suppose it’s one of those things that exists not for social or technological realism but for ease of storytelling.
It's as if the word "allegory" has completely vanished from the English language.
This video may help explain why these kinds of details generally aren't the most important thing on a movie set.
"It's one line in the script. 'Thank God they invented the - you know, whatever device.'"
~ Thank You For Smoking
Posted by: Daniel Ream | September 06, 2019 at 19:44
It’s as if the word “allegory” has completely vanished from the English language.
Heh. Yes, that, an al-a-ma-whatsit.
The Expanse is definitely growing on me. It took a few episodes to find its footing – there’s a lot of worldbuilding to do and the plotting and pacing starts off a little wobbly - but things pick up significantly in time for season two, and more so in season three. I’d be happy to watch it just for Shohreh Aghdashloo’s elaborate wardrobe choices. She may be pulling a high-g burn or facing imminent annihilation in a hail of nuclear torpedoes, but by God she’ll go out looking fabulous.
She’s a Servalan for the 21st century.
Posted by: David | September 06, 2019 at 19:58
The clock is ticking, someone save the cat
That reminds me- Mrs James is expecting intimacy tonight
Posted by: a different james | September 06, 2019 at 21:34
That reminds me- Mrs James is expecting intimacy tonight
[ Summons henchlesbians. ]
Posted by: David | September 06, 2019 at 21:41
The Expanse is definitely growing on me.
That lead character though. Such an odd show in that it brings so much to the table yet finds many different ways to undermine all that solid work. Overall worth it but there's enough holding it back to rule out a re-watch.
Posted by: Sam | September 06, 2019 at 22:04
there’s a lot of worldbuilding to do and the plotting and pacing starts off a little wobbly
I'm a big fan just by virtue of the fact that it's at least sort-of kind-of trying to do hard SF, and that's an untapped subgenre. But it comes with the hazard that most people have no familiarity with SF that doesn't follow the Star Trek model, so there's a certain amount of groundwork that has to be laid.
Posted by: Daniel Ream | September 06, 2019 at 23:35
Soylent Green is people.
Posted by: Steve E | September 07, 2019 at 00:22
It's a slippery slope from waiting for people to die and harvesting them in the street.
Posted by: Steve E | September 07, 2019 at 00:28
It's a slippery slope from waiting for people to die and harvesting them in the street.
It's a slippery slope from apt comments to self-referential links.
The page source shows that you intended this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wa4U6TQlNI
Posted by: pst314 | September 07, 2019 at 01:17
The page source shows that you intended this:
Thanks pst314! It's been a long day. I normally test the link before posting.
For anyone who missed it, here it is again https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wa4U6TQlNI
Posted by: Steve E | September 07, 2019 at 02:23
Who's ambitious enough to make this for Halloween?
Posted by: Darleen | September 07, 2019 at 07:11
That lead character though.
He’s not well written or convincingly acted. Just pouty.
Overall worth it but there’s enough holding it back to rule out a re-watch.
Yes, that’s my feeling, more or less. I’ve yet to see any great episodes, anything hitting a 9 or higher - nothing has wowed me in the way that, say, the first few episodes of the retooled Battlestar Galactica did - but there are enough good ones to keep my interest for now. Thanks largely to Ms Aghdashloo’s tailoring and the nature of the MacGuffin.
Posted by: David | September 07, 2019 at 07:59
I’m a big fan just by virtue of the fact that it’s at least sort-of kind-of trying to do hard SF, and that’s an untapped subgenre.
Yes, that’s commendable and, to be clear, the detailed worldbuilding is appreciated. Watching spaceships armed with railguns in battle is fun too, and the MacGuffin is an intriguing one. The main weaknesses, I think, are the casting and acting, at least of some of the main characters. Neither Holden nor Naomi are compelling characters or convincingly acted. Oh, and I could live without the Belter’s patois.
Posted by: David | September 07, 2019 at 10:02
New keyboard design promised hours of amusement.
Not to worry, he has his safety reflective PT belt on.
From my cold dead brony
handshooves.Posted by: Farnsworth M Muldoon | September 07, 2019 at 12:23
Which supports my contention that the chief motive for leftism is hatred
of our civilization (or any civilization.)To be fair it could simply be resentment and envy. At any rate it does not proceed from a healthy mind set.
Posted by: fnord | September 07, 2019 at 14:31
If one were to use the keypants for the primary function of the internet i.e. the viewing of ...... stimulating images *ahem* then how many entertaining typos would result?
Posted by: fnord | September 07, 2019 at 14:44
Re: Keyboard pants.
Does it leave room for the joystick?
(C'mon, y'all had to be thinking that)
Posted by: Uma Thurmond's Feet | September 07, 2019 at 15:11
Not to worry, he has his safety reflective PT belt on.
Car Totaled After Striking Marine Wearing Reflective Belt
Posted by: Hal | September 07, 2019 at 19:36
Interesting point on Tim Newman, that perhaps the reason that less women enter "engineering" roles is there are lots of other "traditionally female" jobs that few men consider, primary school education, childcare, and general healthcare are examples, in such cases it might be better to encourage men to get into these roles rather than get women into engineering, if you want to even out the field.
Scott Adams has another solution - https://dilbert.com/strip/2019-09-04
Posted by: Runcie Balspune | September 07, 2019 at 22:48
Just because you can, doesn't mean you should.
Posted by: Farnsworth M Muldoon | September 08, 2019 at 03:22
Interesting point on Tim Newman, that perhaps the reason that less women enter "engineering" roles is there are lots of other "traditionally female" jobs that few men consider, primary school education, childcare, and general healthcare are examples...
I get the impression there used to be more blokes at least in school education, so it isn't really a 'traditionally female' role, surely. Even so, if that is the case, all the more reason for evening out the role disparity.
Posted by: TimT | September 08, 2019 at 08:49
My first sight of this blog was the piece named "the penny hasn't dropped" - and the following paragraph stayed with me:
It occurred to me recently that I haven't heard much about her recently, for some odd reason, so I looked her twitter account up - and by George, I discovered that Laurie is still going, and the world is still on fire.
Thank God for that.
Well if you like a phrase, you may as well reuse it.
https://mobile.twitter.com/search?q=on%20fire%20from%3Apennyred&src=typed_query
Posted by: Henry | September 08, 2019 at 11:34
Well if you like a phrase
Ooh. This one. This from August 9. This is soooo goooood:
Posted by: WTP | September 08, 2019 at 11:49
My first sight of this blog was the piece named “the penny hasn’t dropped”
It seems so long ago. You’ve been serving time in this dive almost as long as I have.
Posted by: David | September 08, 2019 at 11:50
I get the impression there used to be more blokes at least in school education...
In my corner of South Flyoverlandia, in the Before Times public schools grades 1-6 were almost exclusively the province of female teachers, with males being introduced 7-12. Private schools were female > male in lower school, almost exclusively male in middle and upper school. Parochial schools, no idea, but I suspect, based on tales from friends, that the penguins ruled in the lower grades.
Posted by: Farnsworth M Muldoon | September 08, 2019 at 14:33
I get the impression there used to be more blokes at least in school education, so it isn't really a 'traditionally female' role, surely.
The ratio at my old high school seems about the same today as in the sixties: more than half women but not that much more than half: more women than men teaching English and foreign languages, more men than women teaching the physical sciences, roughly equal numbers teaching history and math.
What troubles me is that the staff directory shows twice as many "special education" teachers as English teachers, showing that the situation has not improved much since the sixties in spite of all the programs to help "disadvantaged" children and families.
Posted by: pst314 | September 08, 2019 at 14:34
It seems so long ago.
From the link: "The planet is boiling; the rivers are drying up..."
Sounds like an apocalyptic novel by J. G. Ballard.
Posted by: pst314 | September 08, 2019 at 14:42
but I suspect, based on tales from friends, that the penguins ruled in the lower grades.
"He shall rule them with a rod of iron" became "She shall rule them with a yardstick of iron."
Posted by: pst314 | September 08, 2019 at 14:44
A happy story: Vegans Storm Spanish Rabbit Farm, Surprised When Farmers Fight Back.
"...The farmer was extremely aggressive and attacked us, strangling activists and smashing their heads with metal poles..."
Posted by: pst314 | September 08, 2019 at 14:48
What troubles me is that the staff directory shows twice as many "special education" teachers as English teachers...
Out of curiosity, I discovered my grade school (public) has a website. Back in the dawn of time, aside from the teachers, there was a principal, a secretary, a nurse, a librarian, the lunch lady and staff, and the custodial staff.
Now there are 23 teachers including gym, art and music for 6 grades, the lunch lady, custodians, a couple of no job listed, the nurse, the principal and 20 other various straphangers to include social workers, psychologists, and family busybodies, the librarian has morphed into a "media specialist", and yet people wonder why education costs more and still don't know is our chirrens learning. There are now a couple of male teachers, though. Back in the day only the music teacher was.
Posted by: Farnsworth M Muldoon | September 08, 2019 at 18:51
Now there are 23 teachers including gym, art and music for 6 grades
Has the number of students increased significantly? That might partly account for the increase.
Posted by: pst314 | September 08, 2019 at 19:30
What troubles me is that the staff directory shows twice as many "special education" teachers as English teachers...
I have no problem with specially trained teachers for kids with various learning or behavioral problems, as long as they really are serving a useful purpose. The intended point of my comment was only that it seemed to indicate that there had been no decrease in the number of kids needing such teachers: Back in the sixties the high school drew students from very different neighborhoods: middle class and upper middle class whites from one direction, working class whites and blacks and ghetto blacks from the other. There were, thus, a lot of kids in the "special ability" track. (A euphemism for "not so smart" or poorly prepared.) All those programs to help disadvantaged kids were supposed to have radically reduced the problem but it seems as if the situation has improved only moderately, which is very depressing. All this is, of course, based on memories that are half a century old.
Posted by: pst314 | September 08, 2019 at 19:39
This is a metaphor for something, although I'm not quite sure what.
Posted by: pst314 | September 08, 2019 at 19:41
Has the number of students increased significantly?
It doesn't say, but the school map shows the same number of classrooms, and there were no separate art or gym teachers (art was done by the regular teachers and gym was run around like madmen at recess), and no kindergarten (that was optional and private), so I am guessing the basic load of real teachers & students is about the same.
Posted by: Farnsworth M Muldoon | September 08, 2019 at 20:15
Ingmar Bergman's King Kong vs Godzilla
Posted by: pst314 | September 09, 2019 at 02:01
Venn diagram of note:

Posted by: pst314 | September 09, 2019 at 02:11
Thought you Brits might find this an enjoyable topic for discussion:
https://quadrant.org.au/magazine/2019/09/brexit-and-the-decline-of-the-english-novel/
David, how’s married life? I’m sure there are many interesting differences from what you 2 have been doing for the last 27 years.
Posted by: Pogonip | September 09, 2019 at 03:49
David, how’s married life?
Achievement unlocked. I’ve engaged Harridan Mode.
Posted by: David | September 09, 2019 at 09:45
I’ve engaged Harridan Mode.
You know they say that wedding cake puts on like 15 pounds, often much more.
Posted by: WTP | September 09, 2019 at 12:57
Achievement unlocked. I’ve engaged Harridan Mode.
. . . Giving, or getting?
Posted by: Hal | September 09, 2019 at 14:37
This is a metaphor for something, although I'm not quite sure what.
Sorry, I screwed that up: the URL should take you to 6 minutes into the video, but the mandatory ads prevent that from happening. Hop ahead to 6:15 and you'll see the metaphorical auto.
Posted by: pst314 | September 10, 2019 at 12:20
"You’ve been serving time in this dive almost as long as I have"
And it's been a wheeze, but I see I'm still writing sentences in the comments like:
"It occurred to me recently that I haven't heard much about her recently"
Posted by: Henry | September 14, 2019 at 21:17