Motoring scenes. || Must go faster. || Assorted foxes. || Jolly jellies. || Today’s word is plausible. || Parenting choice of note. || Remember, loyal citizens, always respect the media. || Runaway duck. || Everything is racist. || Sshh. I think I hear something in the woods. || Modern woes. || So woke, a thread. (h/t, Tim) || A little one. || Sowell on Marx. || One million begonias. || He does this better than you. || How to tie your shoes, with lots of bonus maths. || Nommy-nommy-nom. || Street transaction of note. || And finally, fragrantly, “Offerings are made to the fart god.”
Mathologer for the win.
Posted by: randian | June 26, 2020 at 01:11
The olden days: We had enough sweaters.
Posted by: Hal | June 26, 2020 at 02:17
We had enough sweaters.
Band name.
Posted by: Mark | June 26, 2020 at 02:37
Florida Woman links the devil, 5G, Bill Gates, Hillary Clinton, "the pedophiles" and the deep state.
---Surely she could have also fit in kumquats, tribbles,
custard recipes, and Lampchop---the puppet---, but apparently she ran out of time.
---I tend to ignore videos, so much faster to skim through text, but yes, when checking this one for the details, she does hit every item.
Posted by: Hal | June 26, 2020 at 04:01
"We had enough sweaters."
Band name.
Um . . . . granting objections, that strikes me as more an album title.
Albeit The Olden Days would be the band name.
Posted by: Hal | June 26, 2020 at 04:04
Is it possible that just about anything could be a band name ?
(e.g. "Is It Possible", "That", "Just About Anything", "Could Be", "A" and "Band Name")
Posted by: BlokeInAShed | June 26, 2020 at 05:47
"Parenting choice of note"
What's the problem, they are both wearing hunting orange!
Posted by: JuliaM | June 26, 2020 at 06:06
Sshh. I think I hear something in the woods.
Plot twist!
Posted by: Joan | June 26, 2020 at 06:52
Offerings are made to the fart god.
This partly explains where eproctophilia came from. :)
Posted by: Russtovich | June 26, 2020 at 07:14
Morning, all.
Style tip: You just can’t be fashionable without some neurotically pretentious self-flagellation.
The woke rewards of nakedly racist spite. One might almost call it privilege.
And for those who missed it yesterday, via Connor: Who knew sociopathy involved so much whining?
Posted by: David | June 26, 2020 at 07:24
Is it possible that just about anything could be a band name ?
No Reply could be a band name.
No Reply could be an album title.
No Reply is indeed a song title.
Anthony Newley could be a band name, and could be an album title.
Can Heironymus Merkin Ever Forget Mercy Humppe and Find True Happiness? would definitely be an album title rather than a band name.
Posted by: Hal | June 26, 2020 at 07:44
always respect the media.
They're activists not journalists.
Posted by: Clam | June 26, 2020 at 08:03
They’re activists not journalists.
Well, to not only be wrong, but to morally and factually invert the situation being illustrated. Quite a feat, really.
Posted by: David | June 26, 2020 at 08:11
Brave Reg hack spends a week eating airline food grounded by coronavirus crash
Posted by: Hal | June 26, 2020 at 08:13
I think the astute followers of this conversation will have noticed a common theme offered in defence of those alleged to have committed horrible crimes - I have 'mental health issues' -(we all have; sweetie, it's called 'Life') - I was an abused child -(who can disprove this? And what does 'abused mean in this context? Denied a TV programme?, forbidden a (insert demand here)?) -I am an oppressed minority (pick your theme).
My point is not to denigrate any people who have genuinely suffered those degradations, though I am sure will be abused for allegedly doing so, but to attempt to highlight the lack of personal responsibility and failure to understand a history, that what went before, though unacceptable in today's world, was considered normal in its day. Eradicating monuments, desecrating statues, means, to me, that we fail to learn from the past and therefore cannot improve and keep those previous (egregious if you like) actions as examples of what we should not do in the future.
Posted by: Judi Evans | June 26, 2020 at 08:35
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8461387/Dont-throw-away.html
Health Secretary Matt Hancock threatens to CLOSE beaches and re-lockdown local areas after 'major incident' is declared in Bournemouth, thousands of Liverpool fans celebrate title win and police come under attack from revellers for second night
Decisive words on the part of the Minister and police.
I wonder why the crowds felt they were under no real moral obligation not to congregate
I wonder why the "revellers" felt no fears about chasing the police away.
And I wonder why, in this case, the Minister and police even criticised the crowds and, in Dorset at least, tried to disperse them?
It's a mystery- no doubt about it
Posted by: a different james | June 26, 2020 at 08:51
Motoring scenes.
Good merging. :-)
Posted by: Mags | June 26, 2020 at 09:14
Good merging. :-)
A year or so ago, the ‘Half and I were driving through the grounds of Chatsworth House when the entire deer population, numbering four or five hundred, decided to amble, in single file, from one side of the park to the other, which entailed crossing the road right in front of us. It was quite a sight and it wasn’t obvious what had prompted this mass relocation. I think it was one of the better traffic hold-ups I’ve been in.
Not, I grant you, as unnerving as a migration of hefty bison, but still.
Posted by: David | June 26, 2020 at 09:22
"We were skipping maybe two meals a day"
Posted by: David | June 26, 2020 at 09:27
“We were skipping maybe two meals a day”
The choice of photo isn’t helping to elicit great sympathy, I fear. I say this as someone who, despite being svelte and gazelle-like, also eats two meals a day. As opposed to six, or whatever number would be considered ideal by the ladies in question.
Posted by: David | June 26, 2020 at 09:36
Motoring scenes.
That Big Boi at 00:50: "I'm not stampeding, I'm just going for a stroll!"
Posted by: Jonathan | June 26, 2020 at 10:23
Remember, loyal citizens, always respect the media.
" I was radicalised by reality your Honor."
Posted by: Jonathan | June 26, 2020 at 10:27
“We were skipping maybe two meals a day”
Elevenses and Eleven-Fifteenses?
Posted by: Karl | June 26, 2020 at 10:39
[ Nibbles on corner of a chicken salad sandwich. ]
Posted by: David | June 26, 2020 at 11:18
Media meets and uncomfortable Truth
Posted by: Jonathan | June 26, 2020 at 11:41
Media meets an uncomfortable truth
“We’re going to have to leave it there…”
Posted by: David | June 26, 2020 at 11:50
Media meets and uncomfortable Truth
It really is a cause for despair. Adam Boulton, say what you will about him - and God knows I do, isn't a stupid man but he's able to completely ignore reality.
You can, in an advanced society, ignore reality for quite some time but it will eventually bite you on the arse. I wouldn't mind so much but the the people in charge seem to be ignoring reality in ever larger doses recently and the arses that are going to be bitten don't belong to them.
I'm sure there's an eproctophilia (upthread) joke in there somewhere but as it's nearing lunchtime I'm not going to look for it.
Posted by: Tom | June 26, 2020 at 12:18
Douglas Murray on the malevolent goblin Priyamvada Gopal.
Posted by: David | June 26, 2020 at 13:40
You can, in an advanced society, ignore reality for quite some time but it will eventually bite you on the arse.
Again, Gods of the Copybook Headings. It's why skipping maybe two meals a day is still somehow making you fat. Was waiting for our host to point out the heavy lifting being done by the word 'maybe'. Though I suspect it came too close to being a lame quasi-ironic pun thingy, so good call there.
Posted by: WTP | June 26, 2020 at 13:46
It really is a cause for despair. Adam Boulton, say what you will about him - and God knows I do, isn't a stupid man but he's able to completely ignore reality.
A psychotherapist--Jordan Peterson, I think--once said in an interview that it can be much more difficult to help highly intelligent and educated people because they can cleverly find reasons to justify and excuse everything that they say and do.
Posted by: pst314 | June 26, 2020 at 14:38
the malevolent goblin Priyamvada Gopal.
lol
Posted by: Min | June 26, 2020 at 15:36
You just can’t be fashionable...
Thomas Sowell has a particularly apt comment on the same thread.
Posted by: Steve E | June 26, 2020 at 15:37
..without some neurotically pretentious self-flagellation.
If someone wants to wear the hair shirt, that's up to them; I just don't accept it as part of a mandatory uniform.
Posted by: Steve E | June 26, 2020 at 15:40
The woke rewards...
And I thought I made it clear when I said that requires a trigger warning. I lost a perfectly good part of my breakfast clicking that link.
Posted by: Steve E | June 26, 2020 at 15:44
lol
Well, I don’t feel I’ve wronged her, the spiteful, racist, lying cow. Thing is, such creatures have always existed and always will. And until quite recently, there was a non-trivial chance that such people might find themselves being directed to the fact that they’re a nasty piece of work. But now we have an elite culture, not least in academia, in which even overtly and gratuitously obnoxious behaviour, indulged in habitually and recreationally, won’t be censured or called out, and will even be rewarded, provided the person in question is sufficiently brown or supposedly marginalised.
Unilateral immunity from normal social consequences might tempt the best of us. Needless to say, Dr Gopal is not the best of us.
Posted by: David | June 26, 2020 at 15:50
You just can’t be fashionable without some neurotically pretentious self-flagellation.
See this response:
https://mobile.twitter.com/michaelmantzmd/status/1276372779265167360
See also: the dhimmi mentality.
See also: the unstable backgrounds of so many (usually female) Westerners who are successfully groomed into converting to Islam.
See also this psychopath:
https://www.thecut.com/2020/02/larry-ray-sarah-lawrence-students.html
Posted by: Squires | June 26, 2020 at 16:06
I lost a perfectly good part of my breakfast clicking that link.
No refunds. Credit note only.
Posted by: Hal | June 26, 2020 at 16:19
You can, in an advanced society, ignore reality for quite some time but it will eventually bite you on the arse.
As Adam Smith said: " There's a great deal of ruin in a nation."
Posted by: Jonathan | June 26, 2020 at 16:33
I've gotten a bit short with friends who've trotted out the "400 years of privilege/slavery" nonsense. Up until the 1880s, my people were dirt farmers in Silesia. When they weren't scraping sustenance out of the earth, they were dying of the plague or getting conscripted to fight against the Poles or the Prussians or the Austrians or the French or whomever decided they wanted control of the upper Oder valley that decade. Some privilege.
Posted by: Governor Squid | June 26, 2020 at 16:35
The Red Guard is holding sway, Jonathan Chait spends a lot of words exposing them here
https://web.archive.org/web/20200625015531/https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/06/white-fragility-racism-racism-progressive-progressphiles-david-shor.html">https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/06/white-fragility-racism-racism-progressive-progressphiles-david-shor.html">https://web.archive.org/web/20200625015531/https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/06/white-fragility-racism-racism-progressive-progressphiles-david-shor.html
in a group of ostensible data analysts...and yet ends the reporting of the beheadings and struggles sessions thusly
Really? REALLY??Posted by: Darleen | June 26, 2020 at 17:16
Oh crap -- bobbled the link -- NYMag is behind a paywall but I could get to the article here:
https://web.archive.org/web/20200625015531/https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/06/white-fragility-racism-racism-progressive-progressphiles-david-shor.html">https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/06/white-fragility-racism-racism-progressive-progressphiles-david-shor.html">https://web.archive.org/web/20200625015531/https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/06/white-fragility-racism-racism-progressive-progressphiles-david-shor.html
Posted by: Darleen | June 26, 2020 at 17:19
I’ve gotten a bit short with friends who’ve trotted out the “400 years of privilege/slavery” nonsense.
Choosing to be steeped in tribal grievance – which very often means pretentious, vicarious grievance, invoking strangers long dead - is not a healthy way to live. It doesn’t seem likely to result in a happy life. Or a personality that isn’t repellent and insufferable.
Posted by: David | June 26, 2020 at 17:20
[ Peers over spectacles at Darleen. ]
Posted by: David | June 26, 2020 at 17:21
ARGH ... WTH??? The preview version did NOT look like that!!
Here's the original link
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/06/white-fragility-racism-racism-progressive-progressphiles-david-shor.html
if you can't read it, go to web.archive.org, plug it in and read the article.
SHEESH
Posted by: Darleen | June 26, 2020 at 17:23
[ Slides tall gin and tonic along bar. ]
You look like you could use it.
Posted by: David | June 26, 2020 at 17:24
Really? REALLY??
Havel’s greengrocers:
https://history.hanover.edu/courses/excerpts/165havel.html?fbclid=IwAR1_2x1jgiiJ0XZv_CbwmcFkhbM2uloAzpZEwcp94Jex4D54IITGhBxK6Co
Posted by: Squires | June 26, 2020 at 17:26
Slides tall gin and tonic along bar.
Thanks, barkeep. [checks purse ... pleasantly surprised]
Here you go ... cha-ching ... let this help catch up on my bartab.
Posted by: Darleen | June 26, 2020 at 17:38
Here you go ... cha-ching ... let this help catch up on my bartab.
Bless you, madam. May hot weather result in no more ironing than usual.
Posted by: David | June 26, 2020 at 17:40
Heh.
Posted by: David | June 26, 2020 at 18:33
Sowell on Marx.
Thanks for that, David. A very informative essay.
Posted by: Miles | June 26, 2020 at 19:08
A very informative essay.
Yes, it appears in The Thomas Sowell Reader.
It isn’t an enormous stretch to think of much of Marx’s output as an elaborate attempt to rationalise his own rather awful personality – the narcissism, selfishness and arrested adolescence; the pathological irresponsibility; the endless mooching. To say nothing of his openly sadistic, indeed class-genocidal, fantasies. That Marxism has subsequently attracted so many narcissists and sociopaths is hardly surprising. Though it’s sort-of funny just how precisely Marx’s own character traits anticipate those of countless middle-class lefties in the many decades since.
See also the chapter on Marx in Paul Johnson’s Intellectuals, which is, I think, better; certainly even more damning.
[ Added: ]
Both of which are available via the Amazon links, top right.
Posted by: David | June 26, 2020 at 19:34
Is New York Democrat Jerry Nadler our own Hal 9000? Jerry Nadler Says Antifa Is Imaginary.
Posted by: pst314 | June 26, 2020 at 20:28
See also the chapter on Marx in Paul Johnson’s Intellectuals
Yes, an excellent book. Very much worth reading.
Posted by: pst314 | June 26, 2020 at 20:29
It isn’t an enormous stretch to think of much of Marx’s output as an elaborate attempt to rationalise his own rather awful personality [...] That Marxism has subsequently attracted so many narcissists and sociopaths is hardly surprising.
See also:
https://www.amazon.com/Understanding-Muhammad-Psychobiography-Allahs-prophet/dp/0980994802/ref=mp_s_a_1_3?dchild=1&keywords=understanding+muhammad&qid=1593200808&sprefix=understanding+muh&sr=8-3
Posted by: Squires | June 26, 2020 at 20:48
Though it’s sort-of funny just how precisely Marx’s own character traits anticipate those of countless middle-class lefties in the many decades since.
That.
Posted by: sH2 | June 26, 2020 at 22:17
I'm wondering what a "holistic, health-based" approach to armed robbery or rape looks like.
Posted by: Darleen | June 26, 2020 at 22:34
“I'm wondering what a "holistic, health-based" approach to armed robbery or rape looks like.”
What a difference a week makes.
Posted by: Sam Duncan | June 26, 2020 at 22:41
I'm wondering what a "holistic, health-based" approach to armed robbery or rape looks like.
I'm sure it won't be pretty. They say:
Although approaches toward using the wrong pronoun or refusing to toe the BLM/Antifa line will probably lead to a more hands on approach.
This is about who controls the police. Ultimately, when control ends up in the wrong hands "Community" policing becomes the NKVD, the Stasi, or the SS.
Posted by: Steve E | June 26, 2020 at 22:47
I'm wondering what a "holistic, health-based" approach to armed robbery or rape looks like.
We've seen that before 100 years ago: Robbers and rapists are victims of capitalist oppression, while those who quietly disagree with Marxists are enemies of the people.
Posted by: pst314 | June 26, 2020 at 22:58
Ultimately, when control ends up in the wrong hands "Community" policing becomes the NKVD, the Stasi, or the SS.
Minneapolis liberals voted for this, and they deserve to get it good and hard.
Posted by: pst314 | June 26, 2020 at 23:00
Reality check:
https://legalinsurrection.com/2020/06/harlem-black-residents-push-back-against-abolishing-the-police/
Posted by: Squires | June 26, 2020 at 23:24
Minneapolis liberals voted for this, and they deserve to get it good and hard.
Indeed. They're about to learn why Oscar Wilde said: "There are two tragedies in life: one is not getting what one wants, and the other is getting it." Oh well.
Posted by: Captain Nemo | June 26, 2020 at 23:43
...which would be part of the Department of Community Safety and Violence Prevention."
I meant to add that we've seen the definition of "violence" stretched beyond all credibility, so disagreeing with Marxists definitely equates to "violence" today
Posted by: Steve E | June 27, 2020 at 00:03
Is there such a word as self-defenestration?
Posted by: Darleen | June 27, 2020 at 01:07
A musical interlude.
'K, it's three entire ~58 minute chunks, but one can still fit 'em in between something . . . .
Posted by: Hal | June 27, 2020 at 03:14
Oh, the world is getting very dark. Here, have a palate cleanser:
http://twitter.com/backt0nature/status/1276421335980400640
Posted by: JuliaM | June 27, 2020 at 06:20
A contrast in temperaments.
It does, I think, work on a symbolic level, a shorthand for the broader phenomenon. Sort of, “How dare you disagree! I should just get my way! I shouldn’t have to know things!”
Again, it does rather suggest a profound failure of parenting.
Posted by: David | June 27, 2020 at 08:48
It isn’t an enormous stretch to think of much of Marx’s output as an elaborate attempt to rationalise his own rather awful personality
See also Sigmund Freud
Posted by: Jonathan | June 27, 2020 at 10:15
Again, it does rather suggest a profound failure of parenting.
Quite possibly. Or she might have had perfectly sensible parents but then attended university where she told that she is the victim of a thousand years of violence and oppression by white people and therefore should be very very angry. And so she became very very angry and found that the chattering classes cheered her on, and it felt good.
Posted by: Horace Dunn | June 27, 2020 at 10:35
Me, reading This Twitter thread
Posted by: Jonathan | June 27, 2020 at 11:34
Quite possibly. Or…
That too. It does matter who gets to educate your children.
Posted by: David | June 27, 2020 at 12:10
“Simple color blindness is not enough to make women and people of color feel welcome and fully equal in spaces in which few of them have been admitted.”
Yeah, that's a handy excuse, isn't it? War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Colourblindness is Racism.
None of this makes one jot of sense until you understand that certain groups are actively trying to reopen racial divides in the west in order to weaken us.
“This is about who controls the police. Ultimately, when control ends up in the wrong hands "Community" policing becomes the NKVD, the Stasi, or the SS.”
In the Soviet case, that's precisely what happened:
... i.e., the MVD, later to become the NKVD.
“Minneapolis liberals voted for this, and they deserve to get it good and hard.”
Note that in Russia it was the pre-revolutionary Provisional Government which started the ball rolling. Whether through sympathy with the Bolsheviks or in an attempt to appease them I don't know, but Lenin inherited the Militsya/MVD; he didn't have to create it.
Oh, and let's not forget, returning to that last point, that the Russian revolution was fomented by Germany to get the Russians out of WWI.
“Is there such a word as self-defenestration?”
The thread is priceless. “Good luck finding the talking dog”.
“A contrast in temperaments.”
“Waaaaah! It's so unfair! I hate you! Uuuuurgh!”
Posted by: Sam Duncan | June 27, 2020 at 14:04
Simple color blindness is not enough
The alternatives are well known and not generally considered attractive. Not being overly interested in a person’s race is, in the real world, as good as it gets. All other directions are downhill.
Posted by: David | June 27, 2020 at 14:28
One more time. Always respect the media.
Via Damian.
Posted by: David | June 27, 2020 at 15:50
One more time. Always respect the media.
'Today's word is gaslighting'...
Posted by: [+] | June 27, 2020 at 16:17
Not being overly interested in a person’s race is, in the real world, as good as it gets.
The usual whine that "color-blindness" is Evil Racism(tm) is the claim that "but I don't see your race, I see you" is all about "race" in that statement, not the "you".
Of course I *see* the "race" of someone I meet for the first time. I'm introduced to someone new at an office meeting, I'm told their name "A" and I see their sex, height, hair color, eye color, clothing - all quick sketch notes for I can then identify "A" and remember them at the next meeting or in the office. But if I start spending more time with this person - working on a project together, or becoming friends - ALL those characteristics fade into the background as "A" becomes a familiar part of my life and I learn all the other things that make "A" a unique individual with unique likes/dislikes, interests, skills and life experiences.
Leftism is dedicated to wiping out those relationships - from destruction of the family to dictating who/where/how is acceptable socialization.
Posted by: Darleen | June 27, 2020 at 16:29
Leftism is dedicated to wiping out those relationships - from destruction of the family to dictating who/where/how is acceptable socialization.
The word is atomization; break down all human bonds not in service to the ideology and raise in their place those that serve to maintain loyalty to the ideology and its authors. Divide the followers from everything that might give them succor outside of the ideology so that they will have it alone to cling to. Promise righteousness, praise, and earthly rewards in exchange for serving the ideology in ways that will further alienate the followers from all those outside the fold, blood relatives included.
Muhammad did this in 7th century Arabia. Marxists have been sowing it for a century. The “woke” of today are so divided from everything that many are willing to transform themselves into grotesque, neon-haired psuedo-hermaphrodites in order to more deeply “belong” in the Pandemonium of Intersectionality. And if that leaves such individuals so unattractive that no one will sleep with them unless it is to prove their own ideological purity, how does the ideology lose?
Posted by: Squires | June 27, 2020 at 17:33
Praise Zeus. I was getting angst.
Posted by: WTP | June 28, 2020 at 00:38
From the comments in /.:
I always wanted to know what it was like to live during the time of the Civil War, the Spanish Flu, Great Depression, Civil Rights Movement, Watergate, and the Dust Bowl. Just not all at once though.
Posted by: Hal | June 28, 2020 at 08:02
Hmmm. Interesting tech commentary:
Journalist's Phone Hacked: All He Had To Do Was Visit a Website. Any Website.
Posted by: Hal | June 28, 2020 at 08:26
There is also a locust plague...
https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2020/06/14/876002404/locusts-are-a-plague-of-biblical-scope-in-2020-why-and-what-are-they-exactly
Posted by: Felicity | June 28, 2020 at 09:00
There is also a locust plague...
Details, details . . . .
Posted by: Hal | June 28, 2020 at 09:47
This week in pictures
Oh, don't worry, she's only a thousand feet up in the air . . .
Posted by: Hal | June 28, 2020 at 11:34
"Is It Possible", "That", "Just About Anything", "Could Be", "A" and "Band Name"
"Everything's A Song Cue"
https://www.gocomics.com/culdesac/2010/04/26
Posted by: Baceseras | June 28, 2020 at 20:23
“Interesting tech commentary:”
I like this comment down the thread: “That's a clear violation of GDPR. They need to post a consent popup before continuing with an injection attack. Infiltration without consent is illegal, make sure your company is not doing it.”
Posted by: Sam Duncan | June 29, 2020 at 16:04
Remember, she’s an educator.
Posted by: David | June 29, 2020 at 20:49
“Remember, she’s an educator.”
Andrew Doyle (the guy who writes Titania McGrath) must be sobbing into his beer. We've all been saying for years that the world has gone beyond parody, but seriously... Cambridge University, which refused to defend Jordan Peterson remember, actually promoted this headcase.
Posted by: Sam Duncan | June 29, 2020 at 22:51
Cambridge University, which refused to defend Jordan Peterson remember, actually promoted this headcase.
They also refused to defend Noah Carl when he had his issues with the outrage mob, and in fact dismissed him from his research post. The cynic in me can't help wondering if not defending those two gentlemen was a deliberate ploy by Cambridge University precisely for this reason. This way, Cambridge can say "Look, we took on board what you guys said about freedom of speech the last time this happened, so why aren't you happy?" In a perverted way, I'm glad they are defending her on freedom of speech grounds, even if the speech in question is abominable. I'd just like them to extend the same courtesy to those academics who aren't passengers on the woke train. But I suspect that that's too much to hope for.
Posted by: Captain Nemo | June 30, 2020 at 13:43
How to tie your shoes, with lots of bonus maths
My favorite mathologer video is this one, which introduces a new way to make a bicycle with non-circular wheels: it obviates the need for hinged suspension of the wheels and reduces friction. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eQaF6OmWKw
Posted by: NateWhilk | July 01, 2020 at 07:39