Actual science, people. || Ladder commercial of note. || Lab research of note. || Meanwhile, in Roswell, New Mexico, the visitors are contained. || Today’s word is excavation. || Uncle Tom. || The caring kind. || Consequences. (h/t, Jeff) || I learned a new word today. || Plant nuggets. They taste like chicken, apparently. || GoPro inside a car tyre. || Harry Potter – but with guns. || Musically speaking, a partial success. || Mercedes in peril. || Heh. (h/t, Damian) || Dinnertime negotiation of note. Our place in the food chain is safe, for now. || And how was your day? || She does this better than you. || Often-filmed rock formations. || And finally, a job done, though perhaps not quite as smoothly as one might have hoped.
Ladder commercial of note.
Posted by: Hal | August 07, 2020 at 00:31
Horrifying Satanic messages revealed when playing the the video backwards!!!
Posted by: Hal | August 07, 2020 at 00:52
Murphy Ladder; shut up and take my money!
Assuming that a portion of sales goes to our host...
Posted by: Angus | August 07, 2020 at 01:17
Heh
Wife and I had wanted to see the 1969 UK film Kes and it finally showed up in our YouTube Library last week. Best foreign language film lacking subtitles that I've ever seen. Do you suppose a class or two in lip reading might have helped?
Posted by: WTP | August 07, 2020 at 02:47
Lab research of note.
They didn't give the standard deviation for length.
As a software engineer, I know there is a difference between is-a and has-a. Modesty demands silence, at this point.
Posted by: Richard Cranium | August 07, 2020 at 03:55
Ladder commercial of note.
That is Old Spice-worthy.
Posted by: Daniel Ream | August 07, 2020 at 04:01
Harry Potter – but with guns.
Brilliant. :-)
Posted by: Clam | August 07, 2020 at 06:45
Morning, all.
Brilliant. :-)
It does, er, add a new twist to some familiar scenes. Needless to say, the studio doesn’t approve and I’ve had to replace the link several times already. It’s actually the work of an anti-gun campaigner, though I’m not entirely sure it conveys the intended message.
Posted by: David | August 07, 2020 at 06:59
“This isn’t your world anymore.”
Posted by: David | August 07, 2020 at 07:05
Cunnilingus
Very scientific; "This criterion excluded scenes in which ejaculation occurred either inside the woman or outside the camera’s view, or in which no ejaculation occurred." No teaspoons required.
Posted by: asiaseen | August 07, 2020 at 07:18
I've never understood the persistent urge of anti-gun folks to commandeer the Harry Potter franchise to use in their anti-gun arguements. It's a world where everyone is handed a potentially deadly personal weapon at age eleven-subsidized if they're too poor to buy one on their own-the weapon is then carried more or less constantly, while explicitly evil totalitarian characters deny equal rights to people they consider to be inferior to them by stripping them of their weapons.
Posted by: Serena | August 07, 2020 at 07:57
I’ve never understood the persistent urge of anti-gun folks to commandeer the Harry Potter franchise
Yes, thematically, it’s not an obvious vehicle for anti-gun sentiment. The chief monster of the story is stopped, and the world saved, only by a combination of wits, bravery, and good people with powerful weapons.
Posted by: David | August 07, 2020 at 08:13
I’ve never understood the persistent urge of anti-gun folks to commandeer the Harry Potter franchise
In fact, one thing that irritated me slightly about the final film was the last-minute fudging of agency in the killing of Voldemort. I haven’t read the books and it’s possible I’ve missed something – I’m by no means steeped in the mythos – but in the film, the villain’s destruction looks a bit of a moral convenience, a technical rebound of sorts. In moral terms, it should, I think, be clearer that Harry, our hero, has to kill Voldemort. The dragon has to be slain. Rather than, as it appears, being spared that grim responsibility by a sub-clause of how wands supposedly work.
Posted by: David | August 07, 2020 at 08:25
’ The chief monster of the story is stopped, and the world saved, only by a combination of wits, bravery, and good people with powerful weapons.’
Can anyone think of a film where that doesn’t happen..?
Posted by: JuliaM | August 07, 2020 at 09:05
The Andromeda Strain?
Posted by: Ted S, Catskill Mtns, NY, USA | August 07, 2020 at 09:37
No guns in Alfred Hitchcock's Notorious, either.
Posted by: Ted S, Catskill Mtns, NY, USA | August 07, 2020 at 09:40
An interview with Laurence Fox.
Posted by: David | August 07, 2020 at 09:49
Game review of Note.
Posted by: Jonathan | August 07, 2020 at 11:09
Game review of Note.
Pretentious sourness is very now. Moody teen chic.
Posted by: David | August 07, 2020 at 11:40
“This isn’t your world anymore.”
You all are complaining too much, all I could think of a bunch of oppressed youths screaming it wasn't her world and succeeding in wrapping police tape around a little old lady reeking of white privilege, was that it was exactly like raising the flag on Mt. Suribachi and just as brave.
Posted by: Farnsworth M Muldoon | August 07, 2020 at 12:11
Can anyone think of a film where that doesn’t happen..?
Juraz Herz’s The Cremator.
Posted by: Squires | August 07, 2020 at 12:15
Harry Potter – but with guns.
I thought that was going to be this:
Posted by: PiperPaul | August 07, 2020 at 12:47
but in the film, the villain’s destruction looks a bit of a moral convenience, a technical rebound of sorts. In moral terms, it should, I think, be clearer that Harry, our hero, has to kill Voldemort. The dragon has to be slain. Rather than, as it appears, being spared that grim responsibility by a sub-clause of how wands supposedly work.
Retreating from the moral necessity of good people killing evil people is a mark of cowardice--cowardice of the worst sort. It is a childish denial of reality and of what is necessary to live in this real flawed world.
Posted by: pst314 | August 07, 2020 at 13:28
Not that I've ever watched porn, but a friend who has tells me that the ejaculate in porn is mostly faked, enhanced for visual effect. Or maybe the researchers aren't referring to ejaculate in the videos....?
Posted by: Adam | August 07, 2020 at 14:07
Retreating from the moral necessity of good people killing evil people is a mark of cowardice
Well, in effect, Voldemort inadvertently kills himself due to a wand-ownership technicality and a rebounding spell. (Even at the very end, with everything at stake, Harry is still using non-lethal magic, unlike his foes.) As a literary hubris-nemesis thing, it doesn’t quite work, and as a moral parable, it stumbles at the finishing line. As you say, it’s a kind of moral squeamishness. In the real world, you can’t rely on some convenience that spares you the responsibility of doing what needs to be done. I realise this may be asking a lot of a film series aimed chiefly at children and teenagers. But there are plenty of older children’s stories that don’t fudge the issue.
Posted by: David | August 07, 2020 at 14:10
I halfway figured the Harry Potter video was anti-gun but holy crap that was great. The last attempt to highlight the "absurdity" of guns I saw was that Clive Owen cringefest Shoot 'Em Up. This was so, so much better though - as David says - I don't think the greatness achieved was the one intended.
Posted by: Sam | August 07, 2020 at 14:52
It's no wonder you furriners have trouble understanding the US.
Posted by: Sam | August 07, 2020 at 14:59
But there are plenty of older children’s stories that don’t fudge the issue.
My generation grew up watching Transformers and G.I. Joe cartoons where hundreds of laser bolts filled the screen without anybody ever getting hit. It took some deprogramming at the range for me to learn that 'shooting at somebody' is nowhere near as effective as 'shooting somebody'.
But now I know. And knowing is half the battle.
Posted by: Governor Squid | August 07, 2020 at 15:03
As you say, it’s a kind of moral squeamishness. In the real world, you can’t rely on some convenience that spares you the responsibility of doing what needs to be done
Consider the author, specifically her stunning bravery for retconning the race of her characters and her support for unfettered immigration to other people's neighborhoods, only to melt from criticism at her first departure from the radical dogma on gender communism. She, and many other soft-leftists, are more than willing to wage the culture war from afar but are unable to actually DO anything to stop the nightmare they helped create.
Posted by: Sam | August 07, 2020 at 15:10
David: "In the real world, you can’t rely on some convenience that spares you the responsibility of doing what needs to be done." Not entirely unrelated: Yesterday was the 75th anniversary of the destruction of Hiroshima.
Posted by: RNB | August 07, 2020 at 15:37
An interview with the film composer John Williams: https://www.newyorker.com/culture/persons-of-interest/the-force-is-still-strong-with-john-williams
Posted by: Captain Nemo | August 07, 2020 at 15:57
California's Alabama Hills
Also Vasquez Rocks and the former Iverson Ranch - both in SoCal just north of Los Angeles.
Posted by: Darleen | August 07, 2020 at 16:14
It's no wonder you furriners have trouble understanding the US.
Or consider just Pennsylvania. Especially western Pennsylvania...
Bethlehem
Nazareth
California
Erie
Indiana
York
Lebanon
Whitehall
Wyoming
Forrest Hills
Stowe
Exeter
Oxford
Athens
Derry
New Castle
(king of) Prussia
Manchester
Washington
And those are just off the top of my head due to limited familiarity. And that's putting aside "Moon". Not to mention Intercourse...for other reasons.
Posted by: WTP | August 07, 2020 at 16:16
Capt.,
No, no.
It's "Johnny Williams".
Cf. the credits to "How to Steal a Million".
Posted by: Fred the Fourth | August 07, 2020 at 16:18
Moscow, Dallas, Newark.
Posted by: Sam Duncan | August 07, 2020 at 16:43
Heh...Actually my wife is from Scranton and there's a Moscow right near there that comes up in conversation at times. Funny I neglected it. But in my defense, that's in eastern PA. The dark side.
Though I do see where Newark Castle (Scotts) and Newark-on-Trent (England...presumably on a "trent") would be a challenge.
Posted by: WTP | August 07, 2020 at 16:57
It's no wonder you furriners have trouble understanding the US.
Also, try searching movie/tv locations in California and you can't quite remember "Iverson Ranch" but you remember it's in the California city of Chatsworth. Heh.
Posted by: Darleen | August 07, 2020 at 17:01
It's "Johnny Williams".
Cf. the credits to "How to Steal a Million".
Although that's one of my favourite Audrey Hepburn films, I'd never noticed that he was credited in that manner. You learn something new every day.
Posted by: Captain Nemo | August 07, 2020 at 17:11
I've seen the US voter ID debate revving up ahead of the election most vulnerable to cheating in living memory. The NPC position almost always relies on the tried and true "but poor people" trope. So I decided to look up some stats I find relevant:
(1) The median income for Hispanic Americans is roughly $24K/yr (lower than blacks btw)
(2) The average* Mexican-national wage is roughly $16K/yr (*couldn't find the median)
(3) Mexico requires voter ID's
If an opponent of voter IDs were advising the Mexican government what arguments would they use to advocate their position given IDs are already required?
Fire up your Turing Machine and guess what they would answer. I think they would brave the racist waters and suggest Mexico has a less-than-trustworthy government, so IDs are ineffective.
Posted by: Sam | August 07, 2020 at 17:17
Heh. "An Englishman thinks 100 miles is a long way - an American thinks 100 years is a long time."
Posted by: Y. Knott | August 07, 2020 at 17:18
Low-IQ useful idiots will interpret this as helping Republicans. Well, the <5% who will even be aware of such things.
Posted by: Sam | August 07, 2020 at 17:29
Speaking of guns, remember the A team, massive gunfire and no one getting hit
Posted by: Colin | August 07, 2020 at 19:37
Speaking of guns, remember the A team, massive gunfire and no one getting hit
Heh. I remember a helicopter chase where the bad guys crash into the side of a mountain, explosion, fire, but the bad guys stumble out unharmed except for the smoke inhalation. Which today they'd prolly have to do away with the fire and smoke. Ah, but that was the appeal of the A Team.
Posted by: WTP | August 07, 2020 at 19:59
massive gunfire and no one getting hit
Christopher Brookmyre in One Fine Day in the Middle of the Night has a discussion about the conventions of BDQ (Bullet Deadliness Quotient)in action movies - barrage v single shot and never the two shall mix, and for goodies, when wounded, it's always a non-disabling shot to the shoulder
Posted by: asiaseen | August 07, 2020 at 20:08
Ping! So as I am now getting (mostly) out from under my miserable cash flow problem of the last few years, and as we are approaching happy hour...well here anyway, I thought I would buy a round of MD 20/20 camel humpfat martinis for the house. Hell, throw in a splash of Amaretto while you're at it, barkeep.
Posted by: WTP | August 07, 2020 at 21:07
Ping!
Bless you, sir. Should you find yourself walking around the supermarket in one of these, and slightly irked by the fact that it makes your glasses steam up, may you know the unexpected pleasure of said item triggering loud and infectious delight in a chap with Down’s syndrome.
Posted by: David | August 07, 2020 at 21:14
Heh. Thanks. Well my mask, the only one I will wear, consists of a picture of Trump's mouth and the word "Chi-na". Which itself does trigger a degree of infectious delight. Especially up here in the GA mountains.
Posted by: WTP | August 07, 2020 at 21:36
Don't forget Cleveland National Forest, which is between Los Angeles and San Diego.
Posted by: Alex DeWynter | August 08, 2020 at 01:06
If there is one thing I know, I will never read Terry Pratchett.
Posted by: Pooklord | August 08, 2020 at 02:45
Heh.
I ran into him twice on different aisles, and again at the checkout, each time with the exact same result. He was instantly joyous, an effect that seemed to radiate outwards, improving the moods of anyone nearby. Steamed-up spectacles was a small price to pay.
Posted by: David | August 08, 2020 at 07:26
FWIW clicking the link and reading your story has improved my own mood by a small but clearly discernible amount.
Posted by: John | August 08, 2020 at 10:36
clicking the link and reading your story has improved my own mood by a small but clearly discernible amount.
Paying it forward, as they say.
Posted by: David | August 08, 2020 at 10:37
I will never read Terry Pratchett
Your quality of life will thereby be greatly diminished
Posted by: asiaseen | August 08, 2020 at 11:11
Third world parking problems.
Posted by: Farnsworth M Muldoon | August 08, 2020 at 16:41
Musically speaking, a partial success.
Doesn't quite measure up to other musical instruments
Posted by: Rick Henwood | August 08, 2020 at 18:13
Doesn’t quite measure up to other musical instruments
Despite obvious effort and some ingenuity, it does seem rather, um, limited in its applications.
Posted by: David | August 08, 2020 at 18:22
Doesn’t quite measure up to other musical instruments"
Missed it by inches? Millimetres? Or a whole yardstick?
Posted by: Rick Henwood | August 08, 2020 at 18:57
Musically speaking, a partial success.
I wonder if it could play Rule Britannia?
Posted by: Captain Nemo | August 08, 2020 at 20:49
Your quality of life will thereby be greatly diminished
Of course Death rides a horse, how else would he get around.
And certainly, the horse does have a name.
Binky.
Posted by: Hal | August 09, 2020 at 14:48
I wonder if it could play Rule Britannia?
I don't see why not. Certainly should be able to play Aerosmith
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gweUVWUYYQ8
Posted by: Rick Henwood | August 09, 2020 at 22:22